Literature DB >> 3977183

Reproducibility of VO2max in patients with chronic air-flow obstruction.

S E Brown, C E Fischer, D W Stansbury, R W Light.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the variability in maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) determined from repeated exercise tests in patients with chronic air-flow obstruction (CAO). Three incremental maximal cycle ergometer tests were performed in each of 11 CAO patients who were familiar with such testing. Two tests (Test 1, Test 2) were carried out on the same day, separated by a 60-min rest period, and 1 (Test 3) was performed on a consecutive day. Group mean values for VO2 max were: 1.313 +/- 0.259, 1.311 +/- 0.281, 1.306 +/- 0.288 L/min, for Tests 1 to 3, respectively. These nearly identical values did not differ significantly. There was no systematic "fatigue" or "learning" effect from test to test. Other mean measurements obtained at maximal exercise were likewise not significantly different among the 3 tests. For tests performed on the same day, the mean of the absolute values of the individual patient VO2 max differences (delta VO2 max) was 53 +/- 30 ml. The delta VO2 max was less than 6% in 10 of the 11 patients and less than 10% in the remaining patient. For tests performed on consecutive days, delta VO2 max was 93 +/- 81 ml; delta VO2 max was less than 6% in 6 patients and less than 10% in 9 patients. From this study we concluded that repeated maximal exercise testing is highly reproducible for groups of CAO patients, although some individual patient variability is seen. Individual patient differences in delta VO2 max are less when the 2 tests are performed on the same day than when duplicate testing is performed on consecutive days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3977183     DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1985.131.3.435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  7 in total

1.  Reproducibility of incremental maximal cycle ergometer tests in patients with mild to moderate obstructive lung diseases.

Authors:  N J Cox; J C Hendriks; R A Binkhorst; H T Folgering; C L van Herwaarden
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 2.  Exercise and training in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease.

Authors:  N J Cox; C L van Herwaarden; H Folgering; R A Binkhorst
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Lung function, maximum and submaximum exercise testing in COPD patients: reproducibility over a long interval.

Authors:  A Noseda; J P Carpiaux; T Prigogine; J Schmerber
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Reproducibility of incremental maximal cycle ergometer testing in patients with restrictive lung disease.

Authors:  D D Marciniuk; R E Watts; C G Gallagher
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Comparison of peak oxygen consumption during cycle and treadmill exercise in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  R S Mathur; S M Revill; D D Vara; R Walton; M D Morgan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  Comparison of laboratory- and field-based exercise tests for COPD: a systematic review.

Authors:  Iain Fotheringham; Georgina Meakin; Yogesh Suresh Punekar; John H Riley; Sarah M Cockle; Sally J Singh
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2015-03-19

7.  Are the measurement properties of incremental exercise tests similar between patients with COPD and CHF?

Authors:  Theresa C Harvey-Dunstan; Sally J Singh; Michael C Steiner; Michael D Morgan; Rachael A Evans
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.444

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.