Literature DB >> 3976679

In vivo accuracy of gravity-flow i.v. infusion systems.

R E Crass, J R Vance.   

Abstract

The accuracy of fluid delivery via gravity-flow i.v. infusion systems in hospitalized patients was evaluated. All adult patients on the medical-surgical wards of a university hospital who were receiving i.v. fluids via gravity-flow infusion sets were studied during a four-day period. Data collected approximately every two hours over a 15-hour period daily included the prescribed i.v. flow rate, type of i.v. set (microdrop or macrodrop), drop rate, and the approximate volume of fluid remaining in the i.v. container. Drop rates were measured with a photocell device placed around the drip chamber of the i.v. set. A total of 509 observations involving 86 patients were recorded during the study; drop rates were evaluated at flow rates for which there were 20 or more observations. For the majority of flow rates and set types, less than 15% of observations were within +/- 10% of desired drop rates, while only 21% of observations fell within +/- 20% of desired drop rates. Mean versus desired volume of fluid delivered between observations differed substantially but not as much as anticipated based on drop rate variability, reflecting nurses' attempt to adjust fluid therapy based on volume of fluid delivered. Intravenous fluid delivery via gravity-flow i.v. infusion systems is highly inaccurate. To ensure appropriate fluid delivery, better monitoring or improvement of i.v. fluid administration systems or the use of electronic infusion control devices is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3976679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0002-9289


  5 in total

1.  Mathematical and physical model of gravity-fed infusion outflow: application to soft-bag-packed solutions.

Authors:  N Simon; B Décaudin; D Lannoy; C Barthélémy; M Lemdani; P Odou
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  Non-biological factors in day to day variation of heparin requirements.

Authors:  A G Fennerty; M N Levine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-10-21

Review 3.  Intravenous infusion conditions. Implications for pharmacokinetic monitoring.

Authors:  M C Nahata
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Advantages in Management and Remote Monitoring of Intravenous Therapy: Exploratory Survey and Economic Evaluation of Gravity-Based Infusions in Finland.

Authors:  Antti Puolitaival; Mikko Savola; Petri Tuomainen; Christian Asseburg; Tuomas Lundström; Erkki Soini
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.070

5.  Impact of Inaccurate Documentation of Sampling and Infusion Time in Model-Informed Precision Dosing.

Authors:  Dzenefa Alihodzic; Astrid Broeker; Michael Baehr; Stefan Kluge; Claudia Langebrake; Sebastian Georg Wicha
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.