Literature DB >> 3973725

Intraoperative brain-stem auditory evoked potentials during posterior fossa microvascular decompression.

W A Friedman, B J Kaplan, D Gravenstein, A L Rhoton.   

Abstract

Recent technological advances have led to increased interest in intraoperative evoked potential monitoring. Although theoretically valuable, its precise role remains to be defined, and useful criteria for predicting neurological deficit are not well established. The authors used brain-stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) monitoring during 21 posterior fossa microvascular decompression procedures to assess the value of this technique in predicting postoperative deficit. The surgeon was notified only if there was complete disappearance of wave V. Although no patients had postoperative deafness, BAEP latencies changed significantly in all cases. In four patients, wave V totally disappeared during cerebellar retraction. The BAEP appears to be a very sensitive monitor of auditory function, such that "false positive" results will be frequent if latency criteria alone are used to trigger alterations in surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3973725     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1985.62.4.0552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  13 in total

1.  Intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring during posterior skull base surgery.

Authors:  J M Kartush; M J Larouere; M D Graham; K R Bouchard; B V Audet
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1991

2.  Value of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring in reducing the auditory morbidity associated with microvascular decompression of cranial nerves.

Authors:  R H Wilkins; R A Radtke; C W Erwin
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1991

3.  Sequential changes of auditory brain stem responses in relation to intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure and initiation of secondary brain stem damage.

Authors:  N Kawahara; M Sasaki; K Mii; M Tsuzuki; K Takakura
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 4.  The brainstem and its neurosurgical history.

Authors:  A I Cucu; S Turliuc; C F Costea; A Perciaccante; R Bianucci; S Donell; D V Scripcariu; M D Turliuc
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Neurophysiologic monitoring in posterior fossa surgery. II. BAEP-waves I and V and preservation of hearing.

Authors:  E Watanabe; J Schramm; C Strauss; R Fahlbusch
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Neurophysiologic monitoring in posterior fossa surgery. I. Technical principles, applicability and limitations.

Authors:  J Schramm; E Watanabe; C Strauss; R Fahlbusch
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Intraoperative monitoring of sensory evoked potentials may be neither a proven nor an indicated technique.

Authors:  J D Michenfelder
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1987-01

Review 8.  Monitoring of sensory evoked potentials is highly reliable and helpful in the operating room.

Authors:  W A Friedman; B L Grundy
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1987-01

9.  Intra-operative electrocochleography to monitor cochlear potentials during acoustic neuroma excision.

Authors:  H I Sabin; P Bentivoglio; L Symon; A D Cheesman; D Prasher; F Momma
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Intraoperative monitoring during surgery for acoustic neuroma: benefits of an extratympanic intrameatal electrode.

Authors:  N Mullatti; H B Coakham; A R Maw; S R Butler; M H Morgan
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.