Literature DB >> 3973268

Errors in the visual determination of corrected QT (QTc) interval during acute myocardial infarction.

S Ahnve.   

Abstract

To estimate variations in intra- and interindividual measurements of the corrected QT (QTc) interval, duplicates of 50 twelve lead electrocardiograms (100 photocopies, paper speed 50 mm/s) were given to each of nine investigators in random order. The electrocardiograms were recorded from patients with acute myocardial infarction consecutively admitted to a coronary care unit. Patients receiving drug therapy and those manifesting various arrhythmias were included. Two-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate the results from all 900 QTc measurements. Significant differences in these measurements were registered among investigators and were of major importance (p less than 0.001). This finding illustrates the difficulty in comparing mean values from different studies and emphasizes the difficulties in applying limits for a normal QTc interval to data obtained by different observers. Of less but still significant importance was the interaction between the investigator and electrocardiogram (p less than 0.001). Finally, the random error was calculated and proven to be of no importance (less than 0.5 mm) when more than 11 measurements were performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3973268     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80396-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  11 in total

1.  A new physiological method for heart rate correction of the QT interval.

Authors:  P Davey
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  P Gödde; H P Müller; K Czerski; B Kessler; R Agrawal; M Oeff; H P Schultheiss
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1998-02

3.  New algorithm for QT interval analysis in 24-hour Holter ECG: performance and applications.

Authors:  P Laguna; N V Thakor; P Caminal; R Jané; H R Yoon; A Bayés de Luna; V Marti; J Guindo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  The prognostic accuracy of different QT interval measures.

Authors:  Kaspar Lund; Juha S Perkiömäki; Christian Brohet; Hanne Elming; Mohammed Zaïdi; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Heikki V Huikuri; Hans Nygaard; Anders Kirstein Pedersen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Errors in manual measurement of QT intervals.

Authors:  A Murray; N B McLaughlin; J P Bourke; J C Doig; S S Furniss; R W Campbell
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-04

6.  Comparison of automatic QT measurement techniques in the normal 12 lead electrocardiogram.

Authors:  N B McLaughlin; R W Campbell; A Murray
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-07

Review 7.  QT-interval prolonging drugs: mechanisms and clinical relevance of their arrhythmogenic hazards.

Authors:  M Zehender; S Hohnloser; H Just
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.727

8.  QT interval dispersion in chronic heart failure and left ventricular hypertrophy: relation to autonomic nervous system and Holter tape abnormalities.

Authors:  P P Davey; J Bateman; I P Mulligan; C Forfar; C Barlow; G Hart
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-03

9.  The measurement of the QT and QTc on the neonatal and infant electrocardiogram: a comprehensive reliability assessment.

Authors:  Robert M Gow; Benjamin Ewald; Lillian Lai; Letizia Gardin; Jane Lougheed
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.468

10.  Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Ivaylo Christov; Ivan Dotsinsky; Iana Simova; Rada Prokopova; Elina Trendafilova; Stefan Naydenov
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.