Literature DB >> 3971682

Efficacy of patient-controlled versus conventional analgesia for postoperative pain.

S J Bollish, C L Collins, D M Kirking, R H Bartlett.   

Abstract

Patient-controlled i.v. administration and intramuscular administration of morphine sulfate were compared in a crossover study to determine their relative effectiveness in relieving postoperative pain. Twenty adult patients scheduled for abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups; one group received i.v. morphine sulfate for 24 hours using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, after which they were given morphine sulfate i.m. for 24 hours. The treatment order was reversed for the other group. Amount of narcotic administered, respiratory rate, and levels of discomfort, activity, and sedation were assessed by the nursing staff every two hours. At the end of each 24-hour treatment phase, patients ranked their level of pain, amount of pain relief, level of sedation, ability to sleep, and ability to perform pulmonary toilet. Patients were also asked whether they preferred PCA or i.m. analgesic therapy for future surgery. Patients reported significantly less discomfort while using PCA than during i.m. morphine administration. No significant differences in amount of narcotic used, respiratory rate, nausea and vomiting, or levels of activity or sedation were noted for the two regimens. Patients' rankings of the two treatment modes did not differ significantly, but a majority of patients indicated a preference for future use of PCA. In these postoperative patients, administration of i.v. morphine sulfate by PCA was as safe as i.m. administration and possibly more effective in relieving pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3971682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharm        ISSN: 0278-2677


  16 in total

1.  Patient-controlled analgesia--does it provide more than comfort?

Authors:  L B Ready
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Economic considerations in pain management.

Authors:  S A Schug; R G Large
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The willingness of patients to pay for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in Korea.

Authors:  Hyungsun Lim; Duck-Hyoung Lee; Jeongwoo Lee; Young Jin Han; Huhn Choe; Ji-Seon Son
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-06-19

4.  Trends in pain therapy.

Authors:  F A Chambers; R MacSullivan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Patient-controlled analgesia in the management of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Mona Momeni; Manuela Crucitti; Marc De Kock
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Pain control following posterior spine fusion: patient-controlled continuous epidural catheter infusion method yields better post-operative analgesia control compared to intravenous patient controlled analgesia method. A retrospective case series.

Authors:  Zafer Orkun Toktaş; Murat Konakçı; Baran Yılmaz; Murat Şakir Ekşi; Tamer Aksoy; Yasin Yener; Orkun Koban; Türker Kılıç; Deniz Konya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia in the elderly: risks and benefits of epidural versus intravenous administration.

Authors:  Claude Mann; Yvan Pouzeratte; Jean-Jacques Eledjam
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  N R Searle; M Roy; G Bergeron; J Perrault; J Roof; C Heermans; M Courtemanche; C Demers; R Cartier
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Wiesel; R Grillas
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Comparison between patient-controlled analgesia and intramuscular meperidine after thoracotomy.

Authors:  A Boulanger; M Choinière; D Roy; B Bouré; D Chartrand; R Choquette; P Rousseau
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.