Literature DB >> 3969873

Comparison in the same patient of two programmed ventricular stimulation protocols to induce ventricular tachycardia.

P Brugada, H J Wellens.   

Abstract

In 24 consecutive patients with documented ventricular tachycardia (VT) (22 patients) or fibrillation (VF) (2 patients), results of 2 programmed ventricular stimulation protocols to initiate VT/VF were prospectively studied. Seventeen patients had VT/VF after a healed myocardial infarction (MI) and 7 patients had idiopathic VT. In both protocols (designated 1 and 2), the right ventricular (RV) apex was paced at 100 beats/min, using a maximum of 2 ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) given at twice diastolic threshold. This protocol had a sensitivity of 25%. In protocol 1, the pacing site was changed to the RV outflow tract and the previous steps were repeated; in protocol 2, the pacing rate was increased to 120 and 140 beats/min at the RV apex, also using a maximum of 2 VPCs. The next step in protocol 1 consisted of increase of current strength to 20 mA and repeating previous steps at the RV apex and RV outflow tract, with a maximum of 2 VPCs; in the next step in protocol 2, three VPCs were used during sinus rhythm and pacing was performed at rates of 100, 120 and 140 beats/min. In protocol 1, therefore, only stimulation site and current strength were changed, while in protocol 2 only pacing rate and number of VPCs were modified. Protocol 1 had a sensitivity of 54% and protocol 2 a sensitivity of 83%. The sensitivity of protocol 2 was statistically higher than that of protocol 1 (p less than 0.05). In the group of patients with VT after MI, the sensitivity was 66% for protocol 1 and 93% for protocol 2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3969873     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90380-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of a protocol for induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients referred to a tertiary centre.

Authors:  M J Griffith; N J Linker; D Mehta; D E Ward; A J Camm
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-10

Review 2.  Can the technicalities of electrophysiological testing for ventricular tachycardia be simplified?

Authors:  D E Ward
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-11

3.  Prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A K Bhandari; R Hong; A Kotlewski; N McIntosh; P Au; A Sankoorikal; S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.