Literature DB >> 3967127

Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with pelvic ileal reservoir.

M E Pezim, R J Nicholls.   

Abstract

Fifty-five patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy with a pelvic ileal reservoir between 3 and 82 months previously were sent a detailed questionnaire to assess their quality of life. All patients had experienced an ileostomy at some time. Fifty-one (94 per cent) returned completed questionnaires. The average frequency of evacuation from the reservoir was four times per 24 hours. Antidiarrhoeal medication was required by 14 (27.4 per cent). Continence was normal in 32 (62.7 per cent) and only 3 (5.9 per cent) had troublesome faecal leakage. Twenty-two (43.1 per cent) evacuated stool spontaneously, while 24 (47.1 per cent) needed to catheterize the reservoir for each evacuation. Four patients who had had the reservoir removed were added to the 51 responders to give a total number of 55 whose quality of life was considered in this study. The reservoir was preferred to an ileostomy with regard to confidence (87 per cent), cleanliness (89 per cent), sexual self-image (87 per cent), social (85 per cent) and sport activity (87 per cent), and ease of carrying out work (84 per cent). The overall preference was 87 per cent. Thirty-four (66.7 per cent) felt there was no significant disadvantage associated with the reservoir, while 10 (19.6 per cent) saw the long convalescent period and 9 (17.6 per cent) the requirement for catheterization as drawbacks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3967127     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800720114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  10 in total

1.  Functional outcome and quality of life following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in Indians.

Authors:  Uday Somashekar; Subash Gupta; Arvinder Soin; Samiran Nundy
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Psychological factors in postoperative adjustment to stoma surgery.

Authors:  C A White; J C Hunt
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir.

Authors:  R R Dozois; S M Goldberg; D A Rothenberger; J Utsunomiya; R J Nicholls; Z Cohen; L A Hultén; R L Moskowitz; N S Williams
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The S ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  C A Vasilevsky; D A Rothenberger; S M Goldberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Progress with the pouch--restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  N Mortensen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Restorative proctocolectomy with various types of reservoir.

Authors:  R J Nicholls
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Restorative proctocolectomy is a major advance in the management of ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  N J Carty; A Corder; C D Johnson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  V W Fazio; M G O'Riordain; I C Lavery; J M Church; P Lau; S A Strong; T Hull
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients.

Authors:  T Oresland; S Fasth; S Nordgren; L Hultén
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Familial adenomatous polyposis: ileo-anal pouch versus ileo-rectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Mohammad Mozafar; Kamran Shateri; Ali Tabatabaey; Saran Lotfollahzadeh; Khashayar Atqiaee
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2014
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.