Literature DB >> 3965090

Tissue components of weight loss in cancer patients. A new method of study and preliminary observations.

S B Heymsfield, C B McManus.   

Abstract

A new approach using anthropometric, radiographic, biochemical, and ultrasonic methods allowed partition of body weight into fat, fat-free mass, skeletal muscle, and volume of heart, liver, kidneys, spleen, and tumor. These methods were used to evaluate body composition longitudinally in a pilot group of nine cancer patients, seven of whom lost weight (greater than 2.5 kg) during the study period. Two control groups also underwent the protocol: (1) healthy subjects (+/- 10% IBW) of similar age, sex, and height; and (2) patients with weight loss due to anorexia nervosa. Weight loss in both the cancer and anorexia nervosa groups could be accounted for primarily by loss in fat and skeletal muscle; although the relative magnitude of these tissue losses were approximately the same in both groups, cancer patients lost relatively less body weight. This was because (1) overt or occult ascites (detected radiographically) was present in cancer patients (3 of 9); (2) tumor bulk increased fat-free mass by up to 1 to 2 kg; and (3) the proportional loss in visceral organ volume was less in cancer patients than in anorexia nervosa patients. In the latter group, heart, liver, kidneys, and spleen were reduced in proportion to body weight, whereas in the cancer group as a whole, these organs (when uninvolved with tumor) lost little (heart and kidneys) or no volume (liver and spleen). This initial study suggests that the principal endogenous energy and nitrogen sources during evolution of weight loss in cancer are primarily adipose tissue triglycerides and skeletal muscle proteins. In some cancer patients, fluid accumulation, a large tumor burden, and the slow rate of visceral organ atrophy make body weight an unreliable index of available energy-nitrogen reserves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3965090     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850101)55:1+<238::aid-cncr2820551306>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  20 in total

Review 1.  Can protein-calorie malnutrition cause dysphagia?

Authors:  M S Veldee; L D Peth
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Total parenteral nutrition prevents further nutritional deterioration in patients with cancer cachexia.

Authors:  F Bozzetti; M Ammatuna; S Migliavacca; M G Bonalumi; G Facchetti; A Pupa; G Terno
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Folate and iron metabolism in patients with tumors and inflammations.

Authors:  P Reizenstein
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1985

4.  Characterization of the Yoshida sarcoma: a model of cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Mary Ann Honors; Kimberly P Kinzig
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Effect of growth hormone on tumor and host in an animal model.

Authors:  R F Wolf; B Ng; B Weksler; M Burt; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Computational modeling of cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Kevin D Hall; Vickie E Baracos
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.294

7.  Elevated circulating interleukin-6 is associated with an acute-phase response but reduced fixed hepatic protein synthesis in patients with cancer.

Authors:  K C Fearon; D C McMillan; T Preston; F P Winstanley; A M Cruickshank; A Shenkin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Quantitative body mass characterization before and after head and neck cancer radiotherapy: A challenge of height-weight formulae using computed tomography measurement.

Authors:  Sasikarn Chamchod; Clifton D Fuller; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Aaron Grossberg; Jay A Messer; Jolien Heukelom; G Brandon Gunn; Micheal E Kantor; Hillary Eichelberger; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 9.  Comparison of proposed alternative methods for rescaling dialysis dose: resting energy expenditure, high metabolic rate organ mass, liver size, and body surface area.

Authors:  John T Daugirdas; Nathan W Levin; Peter Kotanko; Thomas A Depner; Martin K Kuhlmann; Glenn M Chertow; Michael V Rocco
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Evaluation of nutritional status in advanced metastatic cancer.

Authors:  N Sarhill; F Mahmoud; D Walsh; K A Nelson; S Komurcu; M Davis; S LeGrand; O Abdullah; L Rybicki
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.