Literature DB >> 3964055

Cervical motion assessment: a new, simple and accurate method.

S M Tucci, J E Hicks, E G Gross, W Campbell, J Danoff.   

Abstract

Accurate assessment of head motion can be a useful tool in clinical studies. Since the head moves on a combination of axes in the cervical spine, evaluation of neck motion is difficult. Assessment of cervical mobility is further complicated because of inadequate reference points on the head from which to measure. Hence, numerous methods for approximating cervical range have been devised. These methods include visual estimation, radiographic analysis, schematography, photography, and a variety of goniometer devices. Disadvantages of these techniques are lack of accuracy and objectivity, radiation exposure, expense, time consumption, and equipment availability. To measure cervical mobility, a standard gravity goniometer with spirit level and head adapter was used, which allowed stabilization. The gravity goniometer can be obtained in a variety of sizes at most hardware stores. The head adapter consists of a wood block into which an arc is carved and elastic straps suspended for securing on the head. The reliability of this instrument was tested and compared to the universal goniometer, and correlation coefficients were determined. When two experienced examiners used the universal goniometer to assess cervical motion, significant intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were found with three of the six criteria measures (p less than 0.05). When one experienced and one novice examiner used the gravity goniometer with head adapter, highly significant ICC values were found for all six criteria measures (p less than 0.01). A single experienced examiner comparing both instruments on the same subjects produced significant ICC values in four of the six criterion measures (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3964055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation versus the side-bending rotation test in individuals with and without hyperlaxity.

Authors:  Brian T Swanson; Austin B Craven; Jeremy Jordan; Rhane Martin
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-10-03

2.  Three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion: reliability of a computer assisted magnetic tracking device compared to inclinometer.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Louis E DeFrate; Kosmas S Stafilas; Emilios E Pakos; James D Kang; Lars G Gilbertson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Intra-instrument reliability of 4 goniometers.

Authors:  R Kevin Pringle
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2003

4.  Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants.

Authors:  Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme; Nicolas Boutin; Alexandre M Dion; Carol-Anne Vallée
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Mapping intended spinal site of care from the upright to prone position: an interexaminer reliability study.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Morgan Young
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2014-05-16

Review 6.  Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chantal H P de Koning; Sylvia P van den Heuvel; J Bart Staal; Bouwien C M Smits-Engelsman; Erik J M Hendriks
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.