Literature DB >> 3963812

Microbiological evaluation of the intraruminal in sacculus digestion technique.

J H Meyer, R I Mackie.   

Abstract

The influence of nature of the feed sample, feeding frequency and pore size on the influx of bacteria and protozoa into synthetic fiber bags suspended in the rumens of sheep fed different diets was studied. Counts of total culturable bacteria in bags with a pore size of 10 microns were less than 30% of the ruminal counts for animals that were fed the lucerne hay and high-roughage diets. The maximum count (62 and 82% of the ruminal count) for these specific diets was obtained by using bags with a pore size of 53 microns. Protozoal counts in bags with pore sizes of 30 and 53 microns were equal to or higher than the ruminal counts for the lucerne hay and high-roughage diets but less than half of the ruminal count for the low-roughage diet. An interaction between incubation time, feeding frequency of the host animals, and the microbial populations developing inside the bags was also demonstrated. The results clearly show that the microbial population inside the bag differed from that of the surrounding ruminal ingesta and that caution must be taken in interpreting results on feed evaluation and especially on rates of degradation when using the in sacculus technique. Factors influencing the influx of bacteria and protozoa into bags with different pore sizes and containing a variety of substrates are discussed together with suggestions for the use of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3963812      PMCID: PMC238929          DOI: 10.1128/aem.51.3.622-629.1986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  11 in total

1.  Some factors influencing the rumen microbial population.

Authors:  A C WARNER
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1962-04

2.  Effect of the presence or absence of rumen ciliate protozoa on the total rumen bacterial count in lambs.

Authors:  J M EADIE; P N HOBSON
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Substrate preferences in rumen bacteria: evidence of catabolite regulatory mechanisms.

Authors:  J B Russell; R L Baldwin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Use of adenosine 5'-triphosphate as an indicator of the microbiota biomass in rumen contents.

Authors:  C W Forsberg; K Lam
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  An evaluation of the nylon bag technique for estimating rumen of grains.

Authors:  W Figroid; W H Hale; B Theurer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 6.  Rumen ciliate protozoa.

Authors:  G S Coleman
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.870

7.  Negative correlation between protozoal and bacterial levels in rumen samples and its relation to the determination of dietary effects on the rumen microbial population.

Authors:  R M Teather; S Mahadevan; J D Erfle; F D Sauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effect of carbohydrate limitation on degradation and utilization of casein by mixed rumen bacteria.

Authors:  J B Russell; C J Sniffen; P J Van Soest
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Factors affecting disappearance of feedstuffs from bags suspended in the rumen.

Authors:  D C Weakley; M D Stern; L D Satter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Quantitative studies of food protein degradation and the energetic efficiency of microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of sheep given chopped lucerne and rolled barley.

Authors:  J C Mathers; E L Miller
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.718

View more
  1 in total

1.  Enumeration of anaerobic bacterial microflora of the equine gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  R I Mackie; C A Wilkins
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.792

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.