Literature DB >> 3963305

Small bowel allografts. Sequence of histologic changes in acute and chronic rejection.

A S Rosemurgy, W H Schraut.   

Abstract

Using a rat model of accessory small bowel transplantation, the histologic sequence of both acute and chronic rejection in intestinal allograft rejection has been defined. Histologically, all allografts were normal for the first 5 postoperative days. Allografts with caval venous drainage were subject to acute rejection. By 6 to 7 days postoperatively, plasma cells and lymphocytes infiltrated the lamina propria of these grafts (phase I). By 8 to 9 days postoperatively, the cellular infiltration intensified and was associated with villous blunting and scattered epithelial sloughing (phase II). By the 10th day, complete mucosal destruction developed, with heavy transmural infiltration by lymphocytes, plasma cells, and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (phase III). This histologic end point of acute graft rejection was accompanied by death of the host. Grafts with portal venous drainage underwent a similar, although less rapid, sequence of histologic changes (phase I 6 to 9 days, phase II 10 to 13 days, phase III 13 or more days) resulting in graft fibrosis and encapsulation. Some variability was seen among different areas of a given circumferential cross section taken from grafts in phases I and II. Studying circumferential cross sections allowed correct classification into the appropriate phases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3963305     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90106-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  9 in total

1.  Multivisceral intestinal transplantation: surgical pathology.

Authors:  R Jaffe; J D Trager; A Zeevi; E Sonmez-Alpan; R Duquesnoy; S Todo; M Rowe; T E Starzl
Journal:  Pediatr Pathol       Date:  1989

2.  Rejection of multivisceral allografts in rats: a sequential analysis with comparison to isolated orthotopic small-bowel and liver grafts.

Authors:  N Murase; A J Demetris; D G Kim; S Todo; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Recent progress in intestinal transplantation.

Authors:  C I Clark
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Formation of microchimerism in rat small bowel transplantation by splenocyte infusion.

Authors:  Da-Xun Piao; Tao Jiang; Lian-Xin Liu; An-Long Zhu; Shao-Feng Jin; Ying-Hui Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  The immune response in small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  C L Clark
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  The effect of small bowel transplantation on the morphology and physiology of intestinal muscle: a comparison of autografts versus allografts in dogs.

Authors:  A Sugitani; A J Bauer; J C Reynolds; W M Halfter; M Nomoto; T E Starzl; S Todo
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  Stephen Pollard
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-05

8.  Value of in vivo electrophysiological measurements to evaluate canine small bowel autotransplants.

Authors:  M A Meijssen; E Heineman; R W de Bruin; H J Veeze; J Bijman; H R de Jonge; F J ten Kate; R L Marquet; J C Molenaar
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Effect of rejection on electrophysiologic function of canine intestinal grafts: correlation with histopathology and Na-K-ATPase activity.

Authors:  I Takeyoshi; S Zhang; Y Kokudo; K Nakamura; A Ikoma; Y Zhu; T E Starzl; S Todo
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.533

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.