Continent ileal urinary reservoir (Kock pouch).

The Kock pouch has three major limitations at the present time: The efferent nipple valve remains by far the weakest link in the procedure. A 10 to 20 per cent failure rate is too high, and it remains to be seen whether further modifications will be successful in the long run. The long-term function is unproven, and it is possible that deleterious effects may be seen as additional follow-up is obtained. Theoretically, the low-pressure system afforded by the Kock pouch may be superior in long-term safety to that provided by reservoirs made from other bowel segments. A stoma is still necessary. In spite of the above, there is a need for this type of procedure. We cannot remain content with the ileal conduit and should continue to search for better functional diversions. It is a debatable issue relative to the superiority of an internal functional reservoir to the urethra, which may lead to night-time incontinence, versus a Kock pouch with a stoma, which must be intubated. Improvement in overall survival from bladder cancer may be hard to come by, unless effective systemic chemotherapy is available; one means is to perform the surgery without delay in patients with potentially lethal cancers. To do this on a large scale, we must make the surgery as safe as possible and provide the least disruption of lifestyle. In some patients an internal intestinal reservoir attached to the urethra will be possible. Other patients may elect for a Kock pouch, whereas others may even be best served by standard ileal conduit. The growth pains of the Kock pouch have been significant but not without a reward.