Literature DB >> 3958125

Physiological properties of the luteinizing hormone pulse signal: impact of intensive and extended venous sampling paradigms on its characterization in healthy men and women.

J D Veldhuis, W S Evans, M L Johnson, M R Wills, A D Rogol.   

Abstract

The pulsatile nature of the gonadotropin signal is a critical determinant of physiological activation of the gonadal axis. Nonetheless, major uncertainties exist regarding the exact patterns of LH secretion that constitute normal physiological profiles in man. To assess possible bases for the discrepancies in the literature, we sampled blood at 5-min intervals for 24 h in eight normal men and eight normal women in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. The constituent 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-min immunoactive LH series and the consituent 6-, 12-, or 24-h sampling durations provided ranges of sampling intensities and durations for analysis of significant LH pulses. A technique for minimizing the influence of false positive immunoassay errors on peak detection was used to aid in estimating apparent true positive LH pulse frequency. Nonlinear curve fitting of the relationship between sampling intensity and apparent true positive LH pulse frequency revealed a stable pulse frequency estimate at intensive rates of venous sampling, with values of 19.5 +/- 1.9 (+/- SEM) pulses/24 h (periodicity, 73.8 +/- 6.5 min/pulse) in men and 20.6 +/- 3.6 pulses/24 h (periodicity, 70.0 +/- 10 min/pulse) in women. Further analyses indicated that sampling every 3.1 and 2.0 min for 24 h would be required to capture 90% of the LH pulses in men and women, respectively. Moreover, even with a 5-min sampling rate, the statistical counting errors of the LH pulse frequency estimates varied markedly with sampling duration; for example, in men sampled in 6-, 12-, and 24-hr sessions, the values were, respectively, 49%, 35%, and 24% of the observed pulse frequencies. Similar variations were found in women. Counting errors were 30-50% higher for conventional 20-min sampling rates than for 5-min sampling intervals. Measured interpulse intervals varied widely from 10-330 min (median, 60 min; n = 131 LH pulses) in men and from 10-340 min (median, 65 min; n = 125 LH pulses) in women. In addition, absolute LH pulse amplitudes varied from 1-28 mIU/ml (median, 4.1 mIU/ml) in men and from 1-24 mIU/ml (median, 3.6 mIU/ml) in women. These estimates were associated with a median number of points identified within each pulse of 6.0 in men and 4.0 in women. In summary, the present exhaustive sampling studies demonstrate for the first time stable estimates of physiological LH pulsations in normal men and women, and document broad ranges of normal LH pulse amplitudes and interpulse intervals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3958125     DOI: 10.1210/jcem-62-5-881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  14 in total

1.  Effects of opioid receptor blockade on luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses and interpulse LH concentrations in normal women during the early phase of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  W S Evans; J Y Weltman; M L Johnson; A Weltman; J D Veldhuis; A D Rogol
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  Motivations and methods for analyzing pulsatile hormone secretion.

Authors:  Johannes D Veldhuis; Daniel M Keenan; Steven M Pincus
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  Effect of pulsatile luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone administration on pituitary-gonadal function in elderly man.

Authors:  M Giusti; G Marini; L Traverso; P Cavagnaro; L Granziera; G Giordano
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Is changing hypothalamic activity important for control of ovulation?

Authors:  R N Clayton; J P Royston; J Chapman; M Wilson; M Obhrai; R S Sawers; S S Lynch
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-07-04

5.  Pulsatile secretion of luteinizing hormone in agonadal men before and during testosterone replacement therapy.

Authors:  A D Genazzani; G Forti; M Maggi; M Milloni; F Cianfanelli; V Guardabasso; V Toscano; M Serio; D Rodbard
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Prolactin secretion in idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism during pulsatile luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone long-term administration.

Authors:  M Giusti; L Traverso; P Cavagnaro; R Torre; R Durante; G Giordano
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  The effect of non-steroidal antiandrogen flutamide on luteinizing hormone pulsatile secretion in male-to-female transsexual subjects.

Authors:  M Giusti; M R Falivene; A Carraro; C M Cuttica; S Valenti; G Giordano
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Luteal phase dynamics of follicle-stimulating and luteinizing hormones in obese and normal weight women.

Authors:  Lauren W Roth; Amanda A Allshouse; Erica L Bradshaw-Pierce; Jennifer Lesh; Justin Chosich; Wendy Kohrt; Andrew P Bradford; Alex J Polotsky; Nanette Santoro
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.478

9.  Actions of estradiol on discrete attributes of the luteinizing hormone pulse signal in man. Studies in postmenopausal women treated with pure estradiol.

Authors:  J D Veldhuis; W S Evans; A D Rogol; M O Thorner; P Stumpf
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Sex differences in ACTH pulsatility following metyrapone blockade in patients with major depression.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Young; Saulo C Ribeiro; Wen Ye
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.905

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.