Literature DB >> 3957163

Brain tumours--problems and perspectives.

J A Swenberg.   

Abstract

The interpretation of carcinogenesis bioassay data is a complex process that requires a 'weight of evidence' approach rather than a rigid decision based solely on statistics. This is particularly true for rat brain tumours, since recent bioassays have demonstrated rather marked variations in the incidence of these neoplasms. The objective of this paper is to point out some of the considerations that should be included in such a 'weight of evidence' approach and to provide a few examples relevant to brain tumours. Areas for future research on mechanisms of neuro-oncology should provide additional information relevant to determining the chemical causes of brain tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3957163     DOI: 10.1016/0278-6915(86)90350-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  3 in total

Review 1.  The role of chemical, physical, or viral exposures and health factors in neurocarcinogenesis: implications for epidemiologic studies of brain tumors.

Authors:  M P Berleur; S Cordier
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Two-year carcinogenicity study of 6-mercaptopurine in F344 rats.

Authors:  A Maekawa; T Nagaoka; H Onodera; Y Matsushima; A Todate; M Shibutani; H Ogasawara; Y Kodama; Y Hayashi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Weight of the evidence on the human carcinogenicity of 2,4-D.

Authors:  M A Ibrahim; G G Bond; T A Burke; P Cole; F N Dost; P E Enterline; M Gough; R S Greenberg; W E Halperin; E McConnell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.