Literature DB >> 3956943

Immediate diagnostic criteria for bacterial infection of ascitic fluid. Evaluation of ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear leukocyte count, pH, and lactate concentration, alone and in combination.

W N Stassen, A J McCullough, B R Bacon, S H Gutnik, I M Wadiwala, C McLaren, S C Kalhan, A S Tavill.   

Abstract

We prospectively evaluated the ascitic fluid (AF) polymorphonuclear cell (PMN) count, pH, and lactate concentration in single ascitic fluids from 60 patients to determine their relative predictive values for the immediate diagnosis of ascitic fluid infection. Nine of the 60 ascitic fluids were malignant. Of the remaining 51 samples, nine from cirrhotic patients were infected. The mean AF pH, lactate concentration, and PMN count in the infected group were 7.20 +/- 0.19, 80 +/- 51 mg/dl, and 18,199 +/- 19,650 cells/mm3, respectively, and all were significantly different from the corresponding values in noninfected ascites. Mean arterial blood-ascitic fluid (B-AF) pH and lactate gradients in the infected group were 0.23 +/- 0.17 and -46 +/- 31 mg/dl, respectively, and were significantly different from the corresponding values in noninfected ascites (p less than 0.05). Significant differences were not found between infected and malignant ascites, except for the AF PMN count (p less than 0.001). In cirrhosis with ascites, an AF pH less than or equal to 7.34 was the most specific single test (100%) and had the highest diagnostic accuracy (98%). In the larger group of patients with ascites of diverse etiology, a B-AF pH gradient greater than or equal to 0.10 or an AF PMN count greater than or equal to 500 cells/mm3 were the single tests with the highest diagnostic accuracy (92%). Combining an AF PMN count greater than 500 cells/mm3 with any of the other diagnostic criteria increased the specificity and diagnostic accuracy (up to 98%) compared to the best single criterion. Although our data support the use of a number of different combinations of AF measurements for the immediate diagnosis of infection, the simplest and most readily obtainable measurements are the pH and PMN count. Therefore, in the clinical setting we recommend the use of either an AF pH less than or equal to 7.34 or a B-AF pH gradient greater than or equal to 0.10 in combination with an AF PMN count greater than 500 cells/mm3 to obtain the highest degree of accuracy in the immediate diagnosis of ascitic fluid infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3956943     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90392-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  14 in total

1.  Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis.

Authors:  K P Moore; G P Aithal
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Determination of D-lactate concentration for rapid diagnosis of bacterial infections of body fluids.

Authors:  M A Marcos; J Vila; J Gratacos; M A Brancos; M T Jimenez de Anta
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Granulocyte elastase in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  F Casafont; M Rivero; M D Fernandez; J Crespo; E Fabrega; E Sánchez; F Pons-Romero
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Spontaneous peritonitis caused by Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  J Pascual; A Sureda; A Lopez-San Roman; R Barcena; L De Rafael; J Hernandez-Cabrero; D Boixeda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Manipulation of ascitic fluid pressure in cirrhotics to optimize hemodynamic and renal function.

Authors:  J A Savino; T Cerabona; N Agarwal; D Byrne
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Diagnosis and management of bacterial infections in decompensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  Maria Pleguezuelo; Jose Manuel Benitez; Juan Jurado; Jose Luis Montero; Manuel De la Mata
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-27

Review 7.  Primary and secondary peritonitis: an update.

Authors:  M Laroche; G Harding
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Analysis of pH, pO2 and pCO2 in drainage fluid allows for rapid detection of infectious complications during the follow-up period after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  H P Simmen; H Battaglia; P Giovanoli; J Blaser
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Effect of peritoneal fluid pH on outcome of aminoglycoside treatment of intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  H P Simmen; H Battaglia; T Kossmann; J Blaser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Shivaram Bhat; Athar A Saeed
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.