Literature DB >> 3954981

Critical evaluation of the NR-1000F Auto Refractometer.

S Ghose, B K Nayak, J P Singh.   

Abstract

The manifest (dry) refractions of 165 eyes of 86 patients, aged 6 to 75 years, were studied on the Nikon Auto Refractometer NR-1000F. The results obtained were compared with the clinical refractive data, and they were analysed for degree of agreement of various refractive components in different types and grades of refractive errors in the separate age groups. On the NR-1000F the spherical and cylindrical components and spherical equivalents skewed towards more minus (or less plus), especially so in emmetropes, low hypermetropes, and low myopes. This error declined with increasing age over 40 years and was also significantly lower in aphakia and mixed astigmatism. Determination of cylinder axis was found to be reliable on the NR-1000F. In spite of the obvious utility of the device its inbuilt automatic fogging system does not seem adequately to neutralise the patient's accommodative efforts, as the fixation target probably induces instrument myopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3954981      PMCID: PMC1040971          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.70.3.221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

1.  An automatic objective optometer. Description and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  D A Polse; K E Kerr
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-03

2.  Studies of an automatic refraction machine.

Authors:  S M Drance; D W Mitchell; M Schulzer
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 1.882

3.  A new automated subjective optometer.

Authors:  R E Bannon
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1977-07

4.  Editorial: Automated refraction.

Authors:  D L Guyton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-11

5.  A clinical study of the autorefractor, an antomatic refracting device.

Authors:  C Dyson
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.882

6.  A clinical evaluation of the american optical SR III subjective refractor.

Authors:  D M Perrigin; J Perrigin; T Grosvenor
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1981-07

7.  Clinical evaluation of the 6600 Autorefractor.

Authors:  C J Pappas; D R Anderson; F W Briese
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-06

8.  Is the Autorefractor reading closest to manifest refraction? A comparison of the patient's previous spectacles and the 6600 Autorefractor reading.

Authors:  C J Pappas; D R Anderson; F W Briese
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-06
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Objective autorefraction in posterior chamber pseudophakia.

Authors:  P S Raj; T Akingbehin; A M Levy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Clinical evaluation of automated refraction in anterior chamber pseudophakia.

Authors:  P Sunder Raj; J R Villada; K Myint; A E Lewis; T Akingbehin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  A comparison of cycloplegic and manifest refractions on the NR-1000F (an objective Auto Refractometer).

Authors:  B K Nayak; S Ghose; J P Singh
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  An evaluation of the NR-1000F Auto Refractometer in high refractive errors.

Authors:  B K Nayak; S Ghose; J P Singh
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor.

Authors:  B Kinge; A Midelfart; G Jacobsen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Receding and disparity cues aid relaxation of accommodation.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.973

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.