Literature DB >> 3954863

Interactions between response stereotypy and memory strategies on the eight-arm radial maze.

R H Dale, N K Innis.   

Abstract

Three groups of water-deprived rats collected water from the ends of the 8-arm radial maze. Sighted subjects, and subjects blinded either with or without pre-enucleation experience on the radial maze, all retrieved the water efficiently. Most of the subjects exhibited the same response stereotypy, regularly choosing 8 adjacent arms of the maze, then stopping in the center of the maze. The strategies underlying this performance were analysed by interrupting trials and rotating the maze 180 degrees after the subject had made 3 choices. Sighted subjects depended on extramaze stimuli, naive-blind subjects depended on intramaze stimuli and experienced-blind subjects ignored their initial 3 choices after the trial was interrupted. Choice accuracy was equally good whether the subject was returned to the position from which it had been removed, or returned to the opposite side of the central platform. All 3 groups of subjects maintained their stereotyped adjacent-arm responding only as long as such responding was consistent with high choice accuracy. Response stereotypy was prevalent on the radial maze, but response strategies were secondary to memory strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3954863     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(86)90043-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  2 in total

1.  Features of participation of spatial memory in choice reactions of white rats.

Authors:  G E Grigoryan; A M Stol'berg
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr

2.  Disruption of component processes of spatial working memory by electroconvulsive shock but not magnetic seizure therapy.

Authors:  Shawn M McClintock; Nick K DeWind; Mustafa M Husain; Stefan B Rowny; Timothy J Spellman; Herbert Terrace; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 5.176

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.