Literature DB >> 3953551

The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk.

K M Flegal, C Brownie, J D Haas.   

Abstract

In epidemiologic studies, individuals may be misclassified with respect to exposure to a risk factor for disease. Such misclassification causes the relative risk of disease associated with the exposure in the population to be biased toward the null value. Here, a formula is derived for the apparent relative risk under misclassification (R) as a function of the sensitivity (U) and specificity (V) of the test for exposure and of the true relative risk (R) and true prevalence of exposure (P(E] in the population. The relative influence of U and V on the bias in R depends both on R and on P(E), with U tending to be more influential at higher values of P(E). When there is misclassification of exposure, variation in P(E) may bias comparisons of relative risk between groups or exposures, either by producing spurious differences or by masking true differences, and may generate spurious trends associated with a third variable such as age. Because the possible effects of misclassification of exposure on relative risk are complex and not easily generalized, the potential degree of bias should be evaluated individually in each situation.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3953551     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  55 in total

1.  Assessment of occupational exposures in a general population: comparison of different methods.

Authors:  E Tielemans; D Heederik; A Burdorf; R Vermeulen; H Veulemans; H Kromhout; K Hartog
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Occupational exposure assessment in case-control studies: opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K Teschke; A F Olshan; J L Daniels; A J De Roos; C G Parks; M Schulz; T L Vaughan
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Social, prognostic, and therapeutic factors associated with cancer survival: a population-based study in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Eric J Holowaty; Ethan Laukkanen; Isaac N Luginaah
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2003-11

4.  Occupational solvent exposure and cognition: does the association vary by level of education?

Authors:  E L Sabbath; M M Glymour; C Berr; A Singh-Manoux; M Zins; M Goldberg; L F Berkman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  The effect of misclassification on the estimation of association: a review.

Authors:  Michael Höfler
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 6.  Extremely low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and cancer.

Authors:  C Poole; D Trichopoulos
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Residential mobility during pregnancy: patterns and correlates.

Authors:  Assia Miller; Csaba Siffel; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2009-07-01

8.  Short term effects of air pollution on health: a European approach using epidemiologic time series data: the APHEA protocol.

Authors:  K Katsouyanni; J Schwartz; C Spix; G Touloumi; D Zmirou; A Zanobetti; B Wojtyniak; J M Vonk; A Tobias; A Pönkä; S Medina; L Bachárová; H R Anderson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Formaldehyde and cancer morbidity among male employees in Denmark.

Authors:  J Hansen; J H Olsen
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 10.  Recent Progress in Sarcopenia Research: a Focus on Operationalizing a Definition of Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Peggy M Cawthon
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.