Literature DB >> 3950743

Recording of spinal somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

I R Whittle, I H Johnston, M Besser.   

Abstract

The authors' experience with intradural and epidural recording of spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP's) during 26 cases of spinal surgery is described. The techniques of monitoring spinal cord function provided good quality SSEP waveforms in patients both with and without neurological deficits. The SSEP configuration and peak latencies remained stable for up to 5 hours during anesthesia with nitrous oxide, halothane, and fentanyl. Patterns of baseline SSEP's were characteristic of different spinal segments. Distortion and asymmetry of these baseline patterns were seen in several patients with spinal neoplasms. Loss of waveform components during surgery occurred with profound hypotension, overdistraction of the vertebral axis, dorsal midline myelotomy, and removal of intramedullary tumors. Persistent loss of waveform components was associated with an acquired neurological deficit. Fluctuations in the amplitude of the SSEP's were common but were not associated with postoperative neurological deficits. Spinal cord monitoring by means of SSEP recording would appear to be useful during extradural spinal surgery, but there are limitations associated with this technique during some types of intradural surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3950743     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1986.64.4.0601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  9 in total

1.  A technique for monitoring evoked potentials during scoliosis and brachial plexus surgery.

Authors:  S K Anderson; B A Loughnan; M A Hetreed
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Do evoked potentials have any value in anaesthesia?

Authors:  A M Lam
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Direct spinal versus peripheral nerve stimulation as monitoring techniques in epidurally recorded spinal cord potentials.

Authors:  T Morioka; S Tobimatsu; K Fujii; H Nakagaki; M Fukui; M Kato; K Shibata; S Takahashi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  False-Positive and False-Negative Results of Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Surgery for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.

Authors:  Ryu Kurokawa; Phyo Kim; Kazushige Itoki; Shinji Yamamoto; Tetsuro Shingo; Toshiki Kawamoto; Shunsuke Kawamoto
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.703

5.  Subpial spinal evoked potentials in patients undergoing junctional dorsal root entry zone coagulation for pain relief.

Authors:  B Prestor; T Zgur; V V Dolenc
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring Does Not Decrease New Postoperative Neurological Deficits in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy or Spondylotic Myelopathy Undergoing One or Two Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion.

Authors:  Brandon G Wilkinson; Justin T Chang; Natalie A Glass; Cassim M Igram
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

7.  D-wave recording during the surgery of a 10-month-old child.

Authors:  Gábor Fekete; László Bognár; László Novák
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Risheng Xu; Eva K Ritzl; Mohammed Sait; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-09-30

9.  Outcome of surgery for intramedullary spinal ependymoma.

Authors:  Ahmed Alkhani; Mohmmed Blooshi; Maher Hassounah
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.526

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.