Literature DB >> 3950251

Clinical and immunologic observations in patients who stop venom immunotherapy.

D B Golden, K Johnson, B I Addison, M D Valentine, A Kagey-Sobotka, L M Lichtenstein.   

Abstract

It is currently recommended that venom immunotherapy (VIT) be continued as long as the sensitivity persists (indicated by positive venom skin tests or RAST). In this pilot study, we performed a retrospective survey of the clinical and immunologic effects of stopping VIT. The 82 patients studied had received maintenance VIT for a mean of 14 months and had stopped VIT a mean of 43 months before evaluation. Subsequent "field" stings in 28 patients caused systemic reactions in six cases (22%), which is significantly higher than the 1% to 3% systemic reaction rate in patients who remain on maintenance VIT. The 22% reaction rate is a minimal estimate caused by loss of venom sensitivity in some patients and residual venom-specific IgG antibody levels in others. Reevaluation of venom skin tests and IgG levels was possible in 43 patients. A tenfold decline from before VIT skin test results was observed in 27 patients (63%). Skin tests remained clearly positive in 32/43 (74%), became weakly positive in 9/43 (21%), and 2/43 (5%) became negative. The IgG level declined from typical maintenance levels before stopping VIT (mean 7.2 +/- 1.2 micrograms/ml) to levels typical of untreated patients at the time of retesting (mean 1.95 +/- 0.3 micrograms/ml). Despite the marked fall of IgG antibody, one third of the patients still had levels in the average range observed in patients receiving maintenance VIT. We conclude that there is a substantial risk of anaphylactic sting reaction if VIT is stopped while venom sensitivity persists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3950251     DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(86)90177-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  7 in total

1.  Diagnosis and prevalence of stinging insect allergy.

Authors:  D B Golden
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1987-05

Review 2.  Standardized extracts. Stinging and biting insects.

Authors:  D R Hoffman; D B Golden
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1987-02

Review 3.  Insect sting allergy: a model for immediate hypersensitivity reactions.

Authors:  R E Reisman
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1993

4.  Benefits and limitations of sting challenge in hymenoptera venom allergy.

Authors:  Katharina Aßmus; Markus Meissner; Roland Kaufmann; Eva Maria Valesky
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2021-01-18

5.  Intralymphatic Immunotherapy (ILIT) With Bee Venom Allergens: A Clinical Proof-of-Concept Study and the Very First ILIT in Humans.

Authors:  Alexandra Chabot; Gabriela Senti; Iris Erdmann; Bettina M Prinz; Brunello Wüthrich; Lara Šošić; Thomas M Kündig; Pål Johansen
Journal:  Front Allergy       Date:  2022-03-16

6.  Determinants of venom-specific IgE antibody concentration during long-term wasp venom immunotherapy.

Authors:  Valerio Pravettoni; Marta Piantanida; Laura Primavesi; Stella Forti; Elide A Pastorello
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 7.  Hymenoptera Venom Allergy: How Does Venom Immunotherapy Prevent Anaphylaxis From Bee and Wasp Stings?

Authors:  Umit Murat Sahiner; Stephen R Durham
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 7.561

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.