Literature DB >> 3948607

Flow cytometric DNA and cytogenetic studies in human tumors: a comparison and discussion of the differences in modal values obtained by the two methods.

B Tribukait, I Granberg-Ohman, H Wijkström.   

Abstract

The numerical chromosome values in 53 human tumors were determined and compared with the modal DNA values as measured by flow cytometry. In tumors with chromosome counts in the diploid and tetraploid range, the modal DNA values were found to correspond to the modal values based on the chromosome counts. In tumors with chromosome counts in the triploid range, however, the modal DNA values were about 15% higher than expected. In order to explain this difference, the ratio between large and small chromosomes in the karyotyped metaphases was assessed. In addition, the DNA content of individual chromosomes, including markers and minutes, was calculated as a reflection of the DNA content of the whole cell. The ratio of large to small chromosomes did not deviate from the normal ratio found in cells with diploid, triploid, and tetraploid chromosome counts. Neither difficulties in karyotyping nor short-comings in the flow cytometric methodology could be used to explain the discrepancy between the expected and empirical modal DNA values. Some of the chromosomes in triploid tumors may, therefore, contain an increased amount of DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3948607     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990070211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  5 in total

1.  In situ hybridization as a tool to study numerical chromosome aberrations in solid bladder tumors.

Authors:  A H Hopman; F C Ramaekers; A K Raap; J L Beck; P Devilee; M van der Ploeg; G P Vooijs
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1988

2.  Detection of numerical chromosome aberrations in bladder cancer by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  A H Hopman; P J Poddighe; A W Smeets; O Moesker; J L Beck; G P Vooijs; F C Ramaekers
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Detection of chromosomal imbalances in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  C Voorter; S Joos; P P Bringuier; M Vallinga; P Poddighe; J Schalken; S du Manoir; F Ramaekers; P Lichter; A Hopman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Chromosomal gains and losses in primary colorectal carcinomas detected by CGH and their associations with tumour DNA ploidy, genotypes and phenotypes.

Authors:  P M De Angelis; O P Clausen; A Schjølberg; T Stokke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Interphase cytogenetics of lung tumors using in situ hybridization: numerical aberrations.

Authors:  S Y Kim; K J Lee; S C Hong; P S Han; J J Lee; H J Cho; A K Kim; J O Kim; M S Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.884

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.