Literature DB >> 3948166

Optimization of monoclonal antibody delivery via the lymphatics: the dose dependence.

M A Steller, R J Parker, D G Covell, O D Holton, A M Keenan, S M Sieber, J N Weinstein.   

Abstract

After interstitial injection in mice, antibody molecules enter local lymphatic vessels, flow with the lymph to regional lymph nodes, and bind to target antigens there. Compared with i.v. administration, delivery via the lymphatics provides a more efficient means for localizing antibody in lymph nodes. An IgG2a (36-7-5) directed against the murine class I major histocompatibility antigen H-2Kk has proved useful for studying the pharmacology of lymphatic delivery. The antibody specifically binds to most cells in Kk-positive strains of mice and to none in Kk-negative mice. At very low doses, most of the antibody remains at the injection site in Kk-positive animals. As the dose is progressively increased, most effective labeling occurs first in nodes proximal to the injection site and then in the next group of nodes along the lymphatic chain. At higher doses, antibody overflows the lymphatic system and enters the blood-stream via the thoracic duct and other lymphatic-venous connections. Once in the blood, antibody is rapidly cleared, apparently by binding to Kk-bearing cells. These findings indicate that the single-pass distribution of monoclonal antibodies in the lymphatics can be strongly dose dependent, a principle which may be of clinical significance in the improvement of immunolymphoscintigraphic imaging, especially with antibodies directed against normal and malignant lymphoid cells. Monoclonal antibodies directed against normal cell types in the lymph node may be useful for assessing the integrity of lymphatic chains by immunolymphoscintigraphy or, more speculatively, for altering the status of regional immune function. The results presented here indicate that a low or intermediate antibody dose may optimize the signal:noise ratio for imaging. In Kk-negative animals, the percentage of dose taken up in the major organs was essentially independent of the dose administered; there was no evidence for saturable sites of nonspecific binding. These findings provide background for attempts to use antitumor antibodies via the lymphatic route. Specific binding to target cells (and any cross-reaction with normal tissues) would presumably be superimposed on the nonspecific pharmacology of the antibody in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3948166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  7 in total

1.  Quantification of transport and binding parameters using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Potential for in vivo applications.

Authors:  E N Kaufman; R K Jain
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Measurement of mass transport and reaction parameters in bulk solution using photobleaching. Reaction limited binding regime.

Authors:  E N Kaufman; R K Jain
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Subcutaneous absorption of monoclonal antibodies: role of dose, site of injection, and injection volume on rituximab pharmacokinetics in rats.

Authors:  Leonid Kagan; Michael R Turner; Sathy V Balu-Iyer; Donald E Mager
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Clinical experience with intra lymphatic administration of 111In-labelled monoclonal antibody PAY 276 for the detection of pelvic nodal metastases in prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  H H Abdel-Nabi; J A Ortman-Nabi; W See; J Lee; R Ireton; M Boileau; M W Unger; C Halverson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

5.  Metastatic dissemination of 3LL variants after treatment with monoclonal antibody to a tumor-associated antigen.

Authors:  A Sacchi; S Kennel; P G Natali; G Tibursi; C A Ghetti
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Monoclonal antibody imaging of human melanoma. Radioimmunodetection by subcutaneous or systemic injection.

Authors:  M T Lotze; J A Carrasquillo; J N Weinstein; G J Bryant; P Perentesis; J C Reynolds; L A Matis; R R Eger; A M Keenan; I Hellström
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Near infrared fluorescent optical imaging for nodal staging.

Authors:  Lakshmi Sampath; Wei Wang; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.