Literature DB >> 3947959

Functional and anatomic differentiation between parvicellular and magnocellular regions of red nucleus in the monkey.

P R Kennedy, A R Gibson, J C Houk.   

Abstract

Single unit recording in awake monkeys was used to search for functional differences between the two divisions of the red nucleus, and anatomical tracing of WGA-HRP was used to investigate inputs to the two divisions. We studied a total of 323 units in 4 red nuclei of two monkeys. Recording sites were identified in histological sections by the locations of lesions and the reconstruction of electrode tracks. Of the units in the RNm 98.5% discharged in high frequency bursts during movement. Only 52% showed reliable responses to somatosensory stimulation, and the responses observed were weaker than the movement-related discharge. None of the units recorded in the RNp showed strong movement-related discharge, and 51% were completely unresponsive during both motor and sensory tests. A dorsolateral group of medium-sized cells that overlaps the rostral half of the main RNm and the caudal pole of RNp appears to represent an extension of the magnocellular region. Retrograde transport of WGA-HRP indicated that some of these cells are rubrospinal neurons. Furthermore, the discharge properties of dorsolateral neurons are like the main RNm neurons, except for lower discharge rates and smaller spike amplitudes. Mouth movements are strongly represented in the dorsolateral region. Anterograde transport of WGA-HRP from the motor cortex demonstrated dense terminal label in RNp as contrasted with light label in RNm. Retrograde transport of WGA-HRP from RNm labeled many more cells in the cerebellar interpositus nucleus than in motor cortex. We concluded that input to RNm from the cerebellum is the likely source of the strong movement-related activity recorded from cells in the RNm. The absence of appreciable movement-related activity in parvicellular red nucleus provides a clear functional distinction between this division and the magnocellular division of the red nucleus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3947959     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90993-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  21 in total

Review 1.  The great gate: control of sensory information flow to the cerebellum.

Authors:  Anna Devor
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Cortical projections to the human red nucleus: a diffusion tensor tractography study with a 1.5-T MRI machine.

Authors:  Christophe Habas; Emmanuel Alain Cabanis
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Somatosensory and movement-related properties of red nucleus: a single unit study in the turtle.

Authors:  R Sarrafizadeh; J Keifer; J C Houk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motor deficit induced by red nucleus lesion: re-appraisal using kainic acid destructions.

Authors:  F Levesque; M Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Is the parvocellular red nucleus involved in cerebellar motor learning?

Authors:  E K Reid; S A Norris; J A Taylor; E N Hathaway; A J Smith; E A Yttri; W T Thach
Journal:  Curr Trends Neurol       Date:  2009-01-01

6.  The importance of hand use to discharge of interpositus neurones of the monkey.

Authors:  P L van Kan; K M Horn; A R Gibson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human cerebellar nuclei.

Authors:  Michael Küper; Markus Thürling; Stefan Maderwald; Mark E Ladd; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 8.  Modulation of neural co-firing to enhance network transmission and improve motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Karunesh Ganguly; Preeya Khanna; Robert J Morecraft; David J Lin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 18.688

9.  Functional connectivity of human chewing: an fcMRI study.

Authors:  A Quintero; E Ichesco; R Schutt; C Myers; S Peltier; G E Gerstner
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 10.  Corticospinal vs Rubrospinal Revisited: An Evolutionary Perspective for Sensorimotor Integration.

Authors:  Rafael Olivares-Moreno; Paola Rodriguez-Moreno; Veronica Lopez-Virgen; Martín Macías; Moisés Altamira-Camacho; Gerardo Rojas-Piloni
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.