Literature DB >> 3947012

An aid to the assessment of bowel preparation prior to colonic resection.

N S Ambrose, M R Keighley.   

Abstract

The removal of solid and liquid faeces from the colon is a prerequisite for safe colonic resection. Previous studies attempting to quantify evacuation of the colon have relied on a subjective opinion on isolated areas of the colon at the time of surgery. In an attempt to validate the surgeon's opinion, we have studied the efficiency of bowel preparation in 55 patients undergoing elective surgery requiring bowel preparation. Efficiency of bowel preparation has been assessed by (i) the subjective evaluation of the operating surgeon, (ii) the weight of faecal residue in the resected colon, and (iii) the production of a 'granule index' based upon the removal of Portex granules from the colon by preparation as measured on plain abdominal X-rays before and after preparation. The correlation between weighed faecal residue and the subjective assessment was poor. In 7 of 20 patients assessed subjectively as having no residue, faecal loading was in excess of more than 0.1 g/cm. The surgical assessment did not correlate with the clearance of Portex granules and two patients who had complete clearance of granules were judged poorly prepared. Surgeons are generally poor judges at assessing success or failure of bowel preparation. Standardisation of success of bowel preparation is important in the comparison of clinical trials and Portex granules would appear to give an accurate preoperative assessment of the efficiency of bowel preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3947012      PMCID: PMC2498155     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

1.  Bowel preparation with mannitol.

Authors:  G L Newstead; B P Morgan
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1979-12-01       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses.

Authors:  T T Irvin; J C Goligher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  A ne method for studying gut transit times using radioopaque markers.

Authors:  J M Hinton; J E Lennard-Jones; A C Young
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Comparison of three methods of whole bowel irrigation.

Authors:  S Minervini; J Alexander-Williams; I A Donovan; S Bentley; M R Keighley
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  An evaluation of colon cleansing regimens.

Authors:  W J Dodds; G T Scanlon; D K Shaw; E T Stewart; J E Youker; G E Metter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Intraoperative irrigation of the colon to permit primary anastomosis.

Authors:  H A Dudley; A G Racliffe; D McGeehan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Influence of bowel preparation and antimicrobials on colonic microflora.

Authors:  Y Arabi; F Dimock; D W Burdon; J Alexander-Williams; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  A physiological appraisal of polyethylene glycol and a balanced electrolyte solution as bowel preparation.

Authors:  N S Ambrose; M Johnson; D W Burdon; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 6.939

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.