Literature DB >> 3943004

A comparison of the 25-cm rigid proctosigmoidoscope with the 65-cm flexible endoscope in the screening of patients for colorectal carcinoma.

N Wilking, N J Petrelli, L Herrera-Ornelas, D Walsh, A Mittelman.   

Abstract

A comparison of the rigid with the flexible sigmoidoscope was evaluated in 293 patients as part of a screening project for colorectal cancer at Roswell Park Memorial Institute. Patients with either a positive family history for colorectal cancer, a positive stool guaiac test result, a history of hematochezia, or a change in bowel habits were randomly assigned to either rigid or flexible sigmoidoscopy. The median distance of colon examined with the flexible instrument was significantly greater than with the rigid scope (55 versus 17 cm, respectively). A significantly greater number of malignant and premalignant lesions were found with the flexible instrument than with the rigid scope. It was concluded that the flexible sigmoidoscope is superior to the rigid scope in the process of screening for colorectal lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3943004     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860201)57:3<669::aid-cncr2820570345>3.0.co;2-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  2 in total

1.  Value of macrobiopsies and transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the histological work-up of rectal neoplasms: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Guus M J Bökkerink; Gert-Jan van der Wilt; Dirk de Jong; Han H J M van Krieken; Robert P Bleichrodt; Johannes H W de Wilt; Andreas J A Bremers
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06-15

2.  Cost-Effective Smartphone-Based Articulable Endoscope Systems for Developing Countries: Instrument Validation Study.

Authors:  Youngjin Moon; Jeongmin Oh; Jaeho Hyun; Youngkyu Kim; Jaesoon Choi; Jeongman Namgoong; Jun Ki Kim
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.773

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.