Literature DB >> 3942053

Survivors of cardiac arrest: prevention of recurrence by drug therapy as predicted by electrophysiologic testing or electrocardiographic monitoring.

B T Skale, W M Miles, J J Heger, D P Zipes, E N Prystowsky.   

Abstract

Sixty-two patients (44 men and 18 women, aged 15 to 75 years) resuscitated from at least 1 cardiac arrest unrelated to acute myocardial infarction were studied. No patient was taking antiarrhythmic drugs at the time of the initial cardiac arrest. Thirty-five patients had coronary artery disease (CAD) and 27 did not. Before drug therapy, control electrophysiologic studies induced ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 43 of 58 patients (74%) (30 of 35 with CAD and 17 of 27 without CAD). At control continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for 48 hours or longer, only 19 of 62 patients (31%) had spontaneous VT, 5 of whom had no VT induced at control electrophysiologic study. Mean follow-up was 22 months. Fourteen of 41 patients, 8 of 25 with and 6 of 16 without CAD, had VT suppressed with drugs during serial electrophysiologic testing, and none had a recurrent arrhythmic event. VT was suppressed in 12 of 14 patients receiving conventional drugs. Of 27 patients with VT induced during all drug studies, 6 died from cardiac arrest and 4 had recurrent VT. Drug efficacy in 20 patients was guided by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, and 4 of 9 patients in whom VT and ventricular pairs were suppressed by drug therapy, as documented by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for 48 hours or longer, died of cardiac arrest. Overall, 26 patients were discharged receiving amiodarone therapy, and 5 died of cardiac arrest and 3 had recurrent sustained VT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3942053     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90962-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

Review 1.  Secondary prevention of sudden death.

Authors:  R Cappato; K H Kuck
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Programmed stimulation in the evaluation of life-threatening or potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  C Gottlieb; M E Josephson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.727

3.  Electrocardiography then and now: where next?

Authors:  D M Krikler
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-02

4.  Holter monitoring versus programmed ventricular stimulation.

Authors:  M Borggrefe; G Breithardt
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.727

5.  Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients without clinically significant coronary artery disease: comparison of clinical, electrophysiological, and survival characteristics with those in similar patients who have clinically significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  C J McLaran; B J Gersh; D D Sugrue; S C Hammill; A R Zinsmeister; D L Wood; D R Holmes; M J Osborn
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-12

6.  [Holter monitoring and programmed ventricular stimulation].

Authors:  B D Gonska
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-12

7.  Community study of the causes of "natural" sudden death.

Authors:  A C Thomas; P A Knapman; D M Krikler; M J Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-12-03

8.  A comparison of sotalol and procainamide in symptomatic ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  L J Jordaens; F Colardyn; D L Clement
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 9.  Electrophysiologic Considerations After Sudden Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Prakash Suryanarayana; Hyon-He K Garza; Jacob Klewer; Mathew D Hutchinson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2018
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.