Literature DB >> 3940452

Alternative paths to long-term care: nursing home, geriatric day hospital, senior center, and domiciliary care options.

S Sherwood, J N Morris, H S Ruchlin.   

Abstract

This paper examines certain quality of life outcomes, as well as comparative costs of care, for selected types of persons entering three very distinct types of alternative service programs that address the long-term care needs of vulnerable elderly persons: nursing homes (NH), geriatric day hospitals (GDH), and senior center (SC) programs. For selected outcomes, based on secondary analysis of the data gathered in another study, it was possible to add to the comparison samples of similar types of persons entering small foster-type domiciliary care homes (DC). From pools of persons entering these programs, six separate sets of comparison samples who were similar at baseline were constructed (GDH-SC, NH-SC, NH-GDH, NH-DC, SC-DC, GDH-DC). Only analyses pertaining to institutionalization and costs were conducted for the last three sets of comparison groups. Except for the issue of institutionalization, quality of life impact analysis showed only a few more post-test differences than would be expected by chance (although the few post-test differences that were observed in each case favored less restrictive settings). This more general similarity of outcome is indeed provocative, suggesting that in many ways the applicants adapted similarly to these quite distinct programs. Cost analyses found that nursing home and geriatric day hospital care, the two most restrictive settings, were also the two most expensive interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3940452      PMCID: PMC1646424          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.76.1.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  3 in total

1.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.

Authors:  F I MAHONEY; D W BARTHEL
Journal:  Md State Med J       Date:  1965-02

2.  The Pennsylvania domiciliary care experiment: I. Impact on quality of life.

Authors:  S Sherwood; J N Morris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Pennsylvania's domiciliary care experiment: II. Cost-benefit implications.

Authors:  H S Ruchlin; J N Morris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 9.308

  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  Adult day health care evaluation study: methodology and implementation. Adult Day Health Care Evaluation Development Group.

Authors:  S C Hedrick; M L Rothman; M Chapko; T S Inui; J R Kelly; J Ehreth
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Medicare home health utilization as a function of nursing home market factors.

Authors:  J H Swan; A E Benjamin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Systematic review of day hospital care for elderly people. The Day Hospital Group.

Authors:  A Forster; J Young; P Langhorne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-27

Review 4.  Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care.

Authors:  Lesley Brown; Anne Forster; John Young; Tom Crocker; Alex Benham; Peter Langhorne
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-23

5.  Predicting the risk of "permanent" nursing home residence: the role of community help as indicated by family helpers and prior living arrangements.

Authors:  R F Boaz; C F Muller
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Why do some caregivers of disabled and frail elderly quit?

Authors:  R F Boaz; C F Muller
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1991
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.