Literature DB >> 3940419

Protein method influences on calculation of tissue receptor concentration.

P J Howanitz, J H Howanitz, C A Skrodzki, T Woloszyn.   

Abstract

Many protein methods are used for estimation of tissue receptor concentration. The authors compared performance, analytic variability, and accuracy of six protein methods used in these calculations. They found the Lowry protein procedure standardized with bovine serum albumin (BSA), usually considered the reference method, to be the most imprecise and most time consuming method. When the BSA standards from the Lowry procedure were assayed with the other methods, results ranged from 74 to 141% of expected. For three other protein standards, reactivity among the six methods varied almost twofold. Comparison of Lowry protein concentrations in cytosols from 46 tumors biopsies with other methods indicated best agreement was with an automated turbidometric (TCA) or a Coomassie dyebinding procedure. Use of protein standardization for the two direct spectrophotometric procedures decreased overestimation of receptor protein concentrations. Because receptor concentration is the quotient of receptor quantity and protein concentrations, tissue receptor results are dependent in part on standardization and choice of protein method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3940419     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/85.1.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  2 in total

1.  Quantification of oestrogen receptors in breast cancer: radiochemical assay on cytosols and cryostat sections compared with semiquantitative immunocytochemical analysis.

Authors:  H M Scheres; A F De Goeij; M J Rousch; G G Hondius; D D Willebrand; A H Gijzen; F T Bosman
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Immunohistology of oestrogen receptor and D5 antigen in breast cancer: correlation with oestrogen receptor content of adjacent cryostat sections assayed by radioligand binding and enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  D D Giri; V J Dangerfield; R Lonsdale; K Rogers; J C Underwood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.