Literature DB >> 393721

Acceptability and cost savings of selective sputum microbiology in a community teaching hospital.

H S Heineman, R R Radano.   

Abstract

Our experience in introducing selective sputum microbiology into a clinical laboratory was recorded prospectively and analyzed. Based on low-power microscopy with determination of ratios of polymorphonuclear to squamous cells, 32% of specimens were discarded as unfit for culture. Speedy processing and prompt telephone calls afforded opportunities to replace these with better specimens, but only 29% of rejected specimens were resubmitted. Interpretive readings of smears for microorganisms yielded meaningful yielded meaningful information to clinicians and correctly predicted culture results in 73.8% of acceptable specimens. Technological time was similar to that required to process the same number of specimens in the usual way, but rejection of unsatisfactory specimens led to a 22% saving in supplies. Clinicians readily accepted the new system. Where nurses are responsible for specimen collection, they must be informed of the rationale for selective culture and the unreliability of gross visual inspection in evaluating sputum.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 393721      PMCID: PMC273216          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.10.4.567-573.1979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  3 in total

1.  Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.

Authors:  P R Murray; J A Washington
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Bacteriuria and the diagnosis of infections of the urinary tract; with observations on the use of methionine as a urinary antiseptic.

Authors:  E H KASS
Journal:  AMA Arch Intern Med       Date:  1957-11

3.  Misinformation from sputum cultures without microscopic examination.

Authors:  H S Heineman; J K Chawla; W M Lopton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  3 in total
  11 in total

1.  The sputum Gram stain.

Authors:  J V Hirschmann
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Rejection criteria for endotracheal aspirates from adults.

Authors:  A J Morris; D C Tanner; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Utility of gram stain in evaluation of sputa from patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  E Sadeghi; A Matlow; I MacLusky; M A Karmali
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Direct examination of unstained smears for the evaluation of sputum specimens.

Authors:  L M Wetterau; R T Zeimis; G E Hollick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of Gram stain and Nomarski optics for screening sputum specimens before culture.

Authors:  L G Reimer; A Kepas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Randomized trial interpreting sputum quality in a clinical laboratory.

Authors:  H H Mizrachi; P N Valenstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of six different criteria for judging the acceptability of sputum specimens.

Authors:  L K Wong; A L Barry; S M Horgan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of viral infection in healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Authors:  Eun Sun Kim; Kyoung Un Park; Sang Hoon Lee; Yeon Joo Lee; Jong Sun Park; Young-Jae Cho; Ho Il Yoon; Choon-Taek Lee; Jae Ho Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sputum Quality Assessment Regarding Sputum Culture for Diagnosing Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Children.

Authors:  Gorica Popova; Katerina Boskovska; Ivana Arnaudova-Danevska; Olga Smilevska-Spasova; Tatjana Jakovska
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-06-30

Review 10.  Diagnostic test for etiologic agents of community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  John G Bartlett
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.