Literature DB >> 3936326

Primary and secondary malposition of silicone central venous catheters.

R M Vazquez, E G Brodski.   

Abstract

We reviewed our experience with the percutaneous insertion of 459 silicone central venous catheters from 1979 to 1984. Special attention was given to the complication of malposition of these catheters. From 1981-1984, 116 consecutive percutaneous silicone central venous catheters (CVC) were inserted using the peel away sheath introducer. There were no primary catheter malpositions using this technique; however, secondary malposition occurred with 6% of the catheters. In addition to the use of this technique, patient response to movement of the guidewire during the catheterization procedure is described. The details of catheter insertion technique which permit operative assessment of the correctness of catheter location are presented. Symptoms and signs of secondary catheter malposition, as well as management required for this problem, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3936326     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02318.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl        ISSN: 0515-2720


  6 in total

1.  Malposition of central venous catheter.

Authors:  T L Lee
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1988-03-01       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Unusual placement of a central venous catheter.

Authors:  S Hoka; M Murakami; T Nagata; H Inoue; S Takahashi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Transfemoral repositioning of malpositioned central venous catheters.

Authors:  G G Hartnell; J Gates; J N Suojanen; M E Clouse
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Analysis of chest X-ray plain film images of intravenous ports inserted via the superior vena cava.

Authors:  Jui-Ying Fu; Ching-Feng Wu; Po-Jen Ko; Ching-Yang Wu; Tsung-Chi Kao; Sheng-Yueh Yu; Yun-Hen Liu; Hung-Chang Hsieh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  A single-center study of vascular access sites for intravenous ports.

Authors:  Ching-Feng Wu; Po-Jen Ko; Ching-Yang Wu; Yun-Hen Liu; Tsung-Chi Kao; Sheng-Yueh Yu; Hao-Jui Li; Hung-Chang Hsieh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Rupture of totally implantable central venous access devices (Intraports) in patients with cancer: report of four cases.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Filippou; Christoforos Tsikkinis; Georgios K Filippou; Athanasios Nissiotis; Spiros Rizos
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-10-19       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.