Literature DB >> 3935663

Differentiation among closely related organisms of the Actinobacillus-Haemophilus-Pasteurella group by means of lysozyme and EDTA.

I Olsen, I Brondz.   

Abstract

Bacteriolysis in Tris-maleate buffer (0.005 M, pH 7.2) supplemented with EDTA (0.01 M) and hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL, 1.0 microgram/ml) was set up to assist differentiation between the taxonomically closely related Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Haemophilus aphrophilus. A. actinomycetemcomitans was more sensitive to lysis in this system than H. aphrophilus. The standard method for bacteriolysis separated the 10 tested strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans into two groups (I and II) based on their lysis patterns, whereas the 7 strains of H. aphrophilus examined were homogeneous. In group I of A. actinomycetemcomitans, EDTA displayed a considerable lytic effect, which was not increased by supplementation with HEWL. In group II, the lytic effect of EDTA was much less, but HEWL had a considerable supplementary lytic effect. When the turbidity of A. actinomycetemcomitans (ATCC 29522) or H. aphrophilus (ATCC 33389) suspended in Tris buffer was monitored at close pH intervals (0.2) from pH 5.2 to 9.2, maximal lysis of ATCC 29522 occurred with EDTA at pH 8.0 and with EDTA-HEWL at pH 7.6, while ATCC 33389 lysed with EDTA at pH 9.0 and with EDTA-HEWL at pH 9.2. When other members of the family Pasteurellaceae (Haemophilus influenzae type b, Haemophilus paraphrophilus, Pasteurella multocida, Pasteurella haemolytica, and Pasteurella ureae) were included for comparison, the group I strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans were the most rapidly lysed by EDTA. H. paraphrophilus was the least sensitive of the gram-negative strains tested, but not as resistant as Micrococcus luteus (control). M. luteus was the organism most sensitive to lysozyme, followed by P. ureae and the group II strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans, while the group I strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans, H. paraphrophilus, and P. haemolytica were the least sensitive organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3935663      PMCID: PMC268481          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.22.4.629-636.1985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

1.  The structure of a disaccharide liberated by lysozyme from the cell walls of Micrococcus lysodeikticus.

Authors:  H R PERKINS
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Controlling EDTA treatment to produce permeable Escherichia coli with normal metabolic processes.

Authors:  L Leive; V Kollin
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1967-07-21       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Salient Biochemical Characters of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans.

Authors:  J Slots
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.552

Review 4.  The barrier function of the gram-negative envelope.

Authors:  L Leive
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1974-05-10       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetate on phospholipids and outer membrane function in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  K L Hardaway; C S Buller
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Increase in sensitivity to antibiotics and lysozyme on deletion of lipopolysaccharides in Escherichia coli strains.

Authors:  S Tamaki; M Matsuhashi
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane buffer modification of Escherichia coli outer membrane permeability.

Authors:  R T Irvin; T J MacAlister; J W Costerton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in human periodontal disease: a cross-sectional microbiological investigation.

Authors:  J Slots; H S Reynolds; R J Genco
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Morphology and ultrastructure of oral strains of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Haemophilus aphrophilus.

Authors:  S C Holt; A C Tanner; S S Socransky
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Role of lipopolysaccharides in antibiotic resistance and bacteriophage adsorption of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  S Tamaki; T Sato; M Matsuhashi
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  3 in total

1.  Susceptibility to hydrophobic molecules and phospholipid composition in Pasteurella multocida and Actinobacillus lignieresii.

Authors:  M E Hart; F R Champlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Identification of Haemophilus aphrophilus and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans by DNA-DNA hybridization and genetic transformation.

Authors:  T Tønjum; G Bukholm; K Bøvre
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Variability of cell surface hydrophobicity among Pasteurella multocida somatic serotype and Actinobacillus lignieresii strains.

Authors:  K R Darnell; M E Hart; F R Champlin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.