Literature DB >> 393518

Double-blind comparison of metoprolol, alprenolol, and oxprenolol in hypertension.

J Tuomilehto, A Nissinen.   

Abstract

A double-blind comparison of the beta-blockers metoprolol, alprenolol and oxprenolol was carried out to evaluate their antihypertensive effect and tolerability. 105 patients with previously untreated hypertension entered the trial and 72 completed it. Side-effects were infrequent and were never the reason for drop-out. All three drugs caused a statistically significant reduction in blood-pressure at the lower of the two doses used during a dose-finding period. At the higher dose employed in this period, metoprolol caused a significantly greater reduction in diastolic blood-pressure than did alprenolol or oxprenolol. All three drugs caused a significant reduction in heart rate. During the following period, the beta-blockers were supplemented if necessary with hydrochlorothiazide. This was required less frequently in the metoprolol group than in the other two groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 393518     DOI: 10.1007/bf00568195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  30 in total

Review 1.  Dropping out of treatment: a critical review.

Authors:  F Baekeland; L Lundwall
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Metabolic effects of beta-adrenoreceptor blockers.

Authors:  H J Waal-Manning
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Haemodynamic effects of beta-adrenorecptor blockers in hypertension.

Authors:  B Ablad; B Ljung; R Sannerstedt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  A comparison between metoprolol and pindolol in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  J Tuomilehto; M Pohjola
Journal:  Ann Clin Res       Date:  1978-02

5.  Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1967-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The dropout problem in antihypertensive treatment. A pilot study of social and emotional factors influencing a patient's ability to follow antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  J R Caldwell; S Cobb; M D Dowling; D de Jongh
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1970-02

7.  Oxprenolol in hypertension: a report on 2,770 patients in general practice originally treated with methyldopa.

Authors:  W A Forrest
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 0.729

8.  Hypertension programme of the North Karelia Project.

Authors:  J Tuomilehto; P Puska; A Nissinen
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1976

9.  Metabolic consequences of atenolol and propranolol in treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  J L Day; N Simpson; J Metcalfe; R L Page
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-01-13

10.  Elevation of serum lipid levels during diuretic therapy of hypertension.

Authors:  R P Ames; P Hill
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of two oxprenolol oral osmotic (OROS) delivery systems in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  G T McInnes; M J Brodie
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Sotalol and metoprolol comparison of their anti-hypertensive effect.

Authors:  O Andersson; G Berglund; R Descamps; J Thomis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.953

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.