Literature DB >> 3934930

Iohexol versus metrizamide for cervical myelography: double-blind trial.

S S Gebarski, T O Gabrielsen, J E Knake, J T Latack, P J Yang, J T Hoff.   

Abstract

Cervical myelography was performed by lateral C1-C2 puncture in 60 patients. Thirty patients received iohexol (an investigational aqueous contrast agent) and 30 received metrizamide in order to provide a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing these contrast media. The two media produced radiographs of equal quality. Contrast-related morbidity was suffered by four patients (13%) in the iohexol group and by 11 patients (37%) in the metrizamide group. These features indicate that iohexol is superior to metrizamide as a contrast agent for cervical myelography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3934930      PMCID: PMC8333908     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  3 in total

1.  Theory and practice: how much contrast for myelography?

Authors:  S F Halpin; P J Guest; J V Byrne
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Iohexol 300 mg I/ml versus Iopamidol 300 mg I/ml for cervical myelography double blind trial.

Authors:  J Valk; F C Crezée; R G de Slegte; G J Hazenberg; J Wolbers; T Bach-Gansmo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Electrophysiological and cognitive effects of lumbar myelography with iopamidol: comparison with diagnostic lumbar puncture.

Authors:  L Provinciali; M G Ceravolo; M Signorino; M Baroni; U Pasquini; R Cerrutti; U Salvolini
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.804

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.