Literature DB >> 3932052

Interim results of a multicenter international comparison of misoprostol and cimetidine in the treatment of out-patients with benign gastric ulcers.

M J Shield.   

Abstract

An interim analysis has been performed of a multicenter randomized double-blind parallel-group comparison of misoprostol 50 micrograms (low dose), misoprostol 200 micrograms (high dose), and cimetidine 300 mg in out-patients with endoscopically diagnosed benign gastric ulcers. The drugs were administered q.i.d. for four weeks. Endoscopic assessments were made before treatment and at four weeks. Clinical assessments and laboratory tests were made before treatment and at two and four weeks. At the interim stage 421 subjects of the target 600 patients had been recruited by 22 principal investigators in 13 countries. Demographic data were similar for all groups with the exceptions of a lower proportion of males and smokers in the cimetidine group. Therapeutic success was defined as complete healing of all gastric ulcers. Cure rates at four weeks, for all eligible patients who received at least one dose of study medication (cohort 1), were significantly lower (P = 0.002) for misoprostol 50 micrograms (41.2%) than for misoprostol 200 micrograms (58.2%). There was no significant difference (P = 0.86) in cure rates between the high dose misoprostol and cimetidine (59.6%) groups. Cure rates were approximately 20% higher for non-smokers than smokers in both misoprostol groups, an effect not observed with cimetidine. In all three treatment groups the incidence of complaints, including diarrhea, was similar and therapy was well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3932052     DOI: 10.1007/bf01309406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  15 in total

1.  The influence of smoking upon the management of the peptic ulcer patient.

Authors:  R C BATTERMAN; I EHRENFELD
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1949-04       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Healing of duodenal ulcer with an antacid regimen.

Authors:  W L Peterson; R A Sturdevant; H D Frankl; C T Richardson; J I Isenberg; J D Elashoff; J Q Sones; R A Gross; R W McCallum; J S Fordtran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Effects of a prostaglandin E1 derivative, SC-29333, and aspirin on gastric ionic fluxes and potential difference in dogs.

Authors:  D G Colton; D A Callison; E Z Dajani
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Effect of SC-29333, an inhibitor of gastric secretion, on canine gastric mucosal blood flow and serum gastrin levels.

Authors:  D G Colton; D R Driskill; E L Phillips; P Poy; E Z Dajani
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1978-11

5.  Effect of 15(R)-15-methyl prostaglandin E2 (arbaprostil) on the healing of duodenal ulcer: a double-blind multicenter study.

Authors:  G Vantrappen; J Janssens; T Popiela; J Kulig; G N Tytgat; K Huibregtse; R Lambert; J P Pauchard; A Robert
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  SC-29333: a potent inhibitor of canin gastric secretion.

Authors:  E Z Dajani; D R Driskill; R G Bianchi; P W Collins; R Pappo
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1976-12

7.  The cytoprotective effects of (+/-)-15-deoxy-16-alpha, beta-hydroxy-16-methyl PGE1 methyl ester (sc-29333) versus aspirin-shock gastric ulcerogenesis in the dog.

Authors:  K R Larsen; N F Jensen; E K Davis; J C Jensen; F G Moody
Journal:  Prostaglandins       Date:  1981

8.  Double-blind clinical trial on gastroduodenal ulcer healing with prostaglandin E2 analogues.

Authors:  K Gibiński; J Rybicka; E Mikoś; A Nowak
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Effect of synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog on aspirin-induced gastric bleeding and secretion.

Authors:  J N Hunt; J L Smith; C L Jiang; L Kessler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Predictors of duodenal ulcer healing and relapse.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; S A Müller-Lissner; E Vogel; P Schmid; J J Gonvers; P Peter; G Strohmeyer; A L Blum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Histamine H2-receptor antagonists versus prostaglandins in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  J G Penston; K G Wormsley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Overview of clinical safety with misoprostol.

Authors:  R L Herting; G A Clay
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2015.

Authors:  Kiichi Satoh; Junji Yoshino; Taiji Akamatsu; Toshiyuki Itoh; Mototsugu Kato; Tomoari Kamada; Atsushi Takagi; Toshimi Chiba; Sachiyo Nomura; Yuji Mizokami; Kazunari Murakami; Choitsu Sakamoto; Hideyuki Hiraishi; Masao Ichinose; Naomi Uemura; Hidemi Goto; Takashi Joh; Hiroto Miwa; Kentaro Sugano; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  The role of arachidonic acid metabolites in gastrointestinal homeostasis. Biochemical, histological and clinical gastrointestinal effects.

Authors:  K J Isselbacher
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  A multicenter international controlled comparison of two dosage regimes of misoprostol and cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer in out-patients.

Authors:  P A Nicholson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.