Literature DB >> 3929682

Impact of netilmicin regimens on the activities of ceftazidime-netilmicin combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

J Blaser, B B Stone, M C Groner, S H Zinner.   

Abstract

The antibacterial activities of ceftazidime and netilmicin were studied in a two-compartment in vitro model. Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures were exposed to changing drug concentrations that mimic human pharmacokinetics. Netilmicin alone reduced the numbers of organisms in cultures of the susceptible strains by more than 99% within 4 h; however, regrowth occurred after 8 h. Although ceftazidime alone killed more slowly than netilmicin, only one of the five strains regrew within 28 h. When both drugs were combined, rapid initial killing occurred without subsequent regrowth. Studied after 24 h in combination with ceftazidime, netilmicin was as effective when given as a single daily dose as when administered in three daily doses that provided 50% more aminoglycoside per day. Decreased bacterial susceptibility was seen after ceftazidime exposure for one strain and after netilmicin exposure for all originally netilmicin-susceptible strains. No such reduction in susceptibility was observed during exposure to the combination. The results of standard in vitro checkerboard tests for synergism were predictive of the initial (4 to 8 h) but not the final (24 to 28 h) assessment of drug interaction in the pharmacokinetic model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3929682      PMCID: PMC176311          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.28.1.64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  9 in total

1.  Two compartment kinetic model with multiple artificial capillary units.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; S H Zinner
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Comparative multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime, moxalactam, and ceftazidime.

Authors:  R Lüthy; J Blaser; A Bonetti; H Simmen; R Wise; W Siegenthaler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Biological variability of multiple dose pharmacokinetics of netilmicin in man.

Authors:  J Blaser; H Rieder; P Niederer; R Lüthy
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Ceftazidime versus tobramycin/ticarcillin in treating hospital acquired pneumonia and bacteremia.

Authors:  R P Rapp; B Young; T S Foster; P A Tibbs; W O'Neal
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  Ceftazidime therapy of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  M J Maslow; A Rosenberg; A A Pollock; R A Press; D Silverman; W El-Sadr; A S Richmond; M S Simberkoff; J J Rahal
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  [Monotherapy of systematic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections with ceftazidime. The causes of therapeutic failures].

Authors:  J Blaser; A Bauernfeind; M Vogt; R Lüthy
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1983-09-02       Impact factor: 0.628

7.  Efficacy of intermittent versus continuous administration of netilmicin in a two-compartment in vitro model.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Single-drug versus combination empirical therapy for gram-negative bacillary infections in febrile cancer patients with and without granulocytopenia.

Authors:  M Piccart; J Klastersky; F Meunier; H Lagast; Y Van Laethem; D Weerts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Ceftazidime compared to tobramycin and ticarcillin in immunocompromised haematological patients.

Authors:  J T Reilly; M Brada; A J Bellingham; C A Hart; C Bennet
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.790

  9 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Issues in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infective agents: kill curves versus MIC.

Authors:  Markus Mueller; Amparo de la Peña; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Quantitative analysis of antimicrobial effect kinetics in an in vitro dynamic model.

Authors:  A A Firsov; V M Chernykh; S M Navashin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Serum bactericidal activity and killing rate for volunteers receiving imipenem, imipenem plus amikacin, and ceftazidime plus amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  P Van der Auwera; J Klastersky; H Lagast; M Husson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Setting and revising antibacterial susceptibility breakpoints.

Authors:  John Turnidge; David L Paterson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides.

Authors:  J Blaser; C König
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; M C Groner; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Once-versus thrice-daily netilmicin combined with amoxicillin, penicillin, or vancomycin against Enterococcus faecalis in a pharmacodynamic in vitro model.

Authors:  S Schwank; J Blaser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Synergism between tobramycin and ceftazidime against a resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain, tested in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  J G den Hollander; A M Horrevorts; M L van Goor; H A Verbrugh; J W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Once-daily versus thrice-daily administration of netilmicin in combination therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in a man-adapted neutropenic animal model.

Authors:  A U Gerber; S Kozak; C Segessenmann; U Flückiger; T Bangerter; U Greter
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  What is the evidence for once-daily aminoglycoside therapy?

Authors:  M L Barclay; E J Begg; K G Hickling
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.