Literature DB >> 3928035

Limited list: limited effects?

R J Taylor, C M Bond.   

Abstract

During the first month after the limited National Health Service drug list came into effect 17 cooperative general practitioners recorded the actions taken when a now prohibited drug would formerly have been prescribed. An average of 6% of direct surgery contacts with patients and 8% of indirect contacts with patients were affected by the new regulations, but in 2% and 4% of cases respectively the patient received the same pharmacological substance under a different (generic or approved) name. Where a real change in pharmacological constitution or formulation had been required four fifths of these substitutes were considered by the doctors to result in less effective treatment. In 1% of contacts no drug was issued or recommended where one would formerly have been given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3928035      PMCID: PMC1416495          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.291.6494.518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  3 in total

1.  Prescribing at the interface between primary and secondary care in the UK. Towards joint formularies?

Authors:  M Duerden; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The limited list.

Authors: 
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1991-11

3.  General practitioners' attitudes towards the limited list.

Authors:  A Reilly; R J Taylor; J Webster
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1986-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.