Literature DB >> 392739

Double blind comparison of short and medium term sulfonamides, sulfamethizole and sulfamethoxazole, in uncomplicated acute urinary tract infections.

T Bergan, O Skjerven.   

Abstract

Sulfamethizole and sulfamethoxazole were compared in a prospective, randomized, double blind study on uncomplicated, acute urinary tract infections. 59 patients were evaluable for therapeutic effect of sulfamethizole and 53 for sulfamethoxazole. The cure rates were 91.5 and 92.5% respectively for sulfamethizole and sulfamethoxazole. The rates of side effects were the same in the two groups, 5.4% and 4.2%. Also instances where the infecting bacteria were sulfonamide-resistant were cured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 392739     DOI: 10.3109/inf.1979.11.issue-3.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0036-5548


  2 in total

1.  Effects of sulfamethizole and amdinocillin against Escherichia coli strains (with various susceptibilities) in an ascending urinary tract infection mouse model.

Authors:  M B Kerrn; N Frimodt-Møller; F Espersen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pivmecillinam versus sulfamethizole for short-term treatment of uncomplicated acute cystitis in general practice: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lars Bjerrum; Bente Gahrn-Hansen; Per Grinsted
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.581

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.