Literature DB >> 3926444

Modified acid reflux test. A benefit and cost analysis.

D R Cummings, H Meshkinpour.   

Abstract

Although the standard acid reflux test is often used to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux (GER), the cost and benefit of this diagnostic test has never been evaluated. In this study, 184 consecutive referrals with esophageal symptoms were interviewed and had an esophagram, an esophageal manometry, and a modified acid reflux test (MART). The results were analyzed to determine how frequently MART altered the clinical diagnosis and to assess the cost of the new information. Patients with typical symptoms of GER (heartburn or regurgitation) were compared to those with atypical presentation (chest pain or dysphagia). Previously unsuspected GER was demonstrated in 63% of the atypical group, whereas no altered diagnosis was made in the typical group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups when mean lower esophageal sphincter pressures and mean pH scores were compared. MART was cost effective only in the atypical group, in which the cost of an altered diagnosis was $633.00.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3926444     DOI: 10.1007/bf01320487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  11 in total

1.  The evaluation of objective measurements of gastroesophageal reflux and their contribution to patient management.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; L F Johnson
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Detection of gastro-esophageal reflux by simultaneous measurement of intraluminal pressure and pH.

Authors:  S G TUTTLE; M I GROSSMAN
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1958-06

3.  Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R Demeester
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  A comparison of clinical measurements of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L J Benz; L A Hootkin; S Margulies; M W Donner; R T Cauthorne; T R Hendrix
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Assessment of distal esophageal function in patients with hiatal hernia and-or gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  D B Skinner; D J Booth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Esophageal manometry: a benefit and cost analysis.

Authors:  H Meshkinpour; M E Glick; P Sanchez; J Tarvin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; J F Helm; J Dent
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Normal lower esophageal sphincter pressure: a comparison of rapid vs. slow pull-through techniques.

Authors:  R W Welch; S T Drake
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Correlation between manometric and pH tests for gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  C Stanciu; R C Hoare; J R Bennett
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Evaluating the costs and benefits of a diagnostic technology: the case of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  J A Showstack; S A Schroeder; H R Steinberg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  2 in total

1.  Value of the 24 hour intraoesophageal pH monitoring in children.

Authors:  S Cucchiara; A Staiano; L Gobio Casali; A Boccieri; F M Paone
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease following various reconstructive procedures for a distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Takeo Kawamura; Akihiro Yasui; Yoshihisa Shibata; Norihiro Yuasa; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 3.445

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.