Literature DB >> 3926144

Old people not known to the general practitioner: low risk group.

E S Williams, N H Barley.   

Abstract

The elderly patients in a large general practice aged 75 and over who lived at home (n = 877) were divided into two groups according to the general practitioner's knowledge of their risk status and were designated "risk status known" (n = 679) and "risk status not known" (n = 198). Forty-three high risk patients in the risk status known group had a functional disability score and experience of mortality that was not dissimilar to those of elderly people in institutions. The medical and social characteristics of a random sample (n = 150) of the risk status known group, after excluding the high risk patients, were compared with the risk status not known group using a Barber Wallis questionnaire. A response rate of 90% was achieved from both groups and a cumulative risk score was calculated by totalling unfavourable replies to the questions. The risk status not known group, which comprised 14% of the patients who lived at home after correcting for the number who had died and moved, had appreciably less contact with the general practitioners, had an appreciably lower cumulative risk score, were confined at home less because of ill health, were less concerned about their health, and were less in need of nursing attention. The findings of this study suggest that the elderly patients who are not known to their general practitioners are in relatively good health when compared with the patients that the general practitioner knows well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3926144      PMCID: PMC1416887          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.291.6490.251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  13 in total

1.  Case finding in elderly people: validation of a postal questionnaire.

Authors:  I Bowns; D Challis; M S Tong
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Screening elderly people: a review of the literature in the light of the new general practitioner contract.

Authors:  E R Perkins
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Geriatric screening.

Authors:  T Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  The quality divide in primary care.

Authors:  M Pringle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-19

5.  Prospective care of elderly patients in family practice part 2: is screening worthwhile?

Authors:  W I Hay
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Needs of elderly people in residential homes: comparison of records held by carers and general practitioners.

Authors:  C J Packham
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-08

7.  Prospective care of elderly patients in family practice. Part 3: Prevalence of unrecognized treatable health concerns.

Authors:  W I Hay; G Browne; J Roberts; E Jamieson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Assessment of patients aged over 75 in general practice.

Authors:  J Tremellen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-12

9.  Age and sex interaction in reported help seeking in response to chest pain.

Authors:  Joy Adamson; Jenny Donovan; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Nish Chaturvedi; Ann Bowling
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Consultation-based screening of the elderly in general practice: a pilot study.

Authors:  C B Freer
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.