Literature DB >> 3925258

Cost effects of restricting cost-effective therapy.

B S Bloom, J Jacobs.   

Abstract

This article examines the cost effects of a closed pharmaceutical formulary on Medicaid expenditures for peptic ulcer disease. Studies were performed before and after the imposition of a closed pharmaceutical formulary and indicated that total Medicaid costs for peptic ulcer treatment were 15.0% lower during the closed formulary than open formulary periods. The overall savings were due mainly to a sharp decline in the number of peptic ulcer patients served by Medicaid. The cost per patient-month of therapy increased by 9.4% between study periods. Pharmaceutical costs per patient-month declined by 78.9%, monthly physician payments increased by 3.1%, and monthly inpatient hospital costs increased by 23.6%. The small, short-term savings may be negated by increased expenditures in the near future when sicker patients, previously denied peptic ulcer drug treatment, may reenter the Medicaid system in need of expensive inhospital treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3925258     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198507000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  8 in total

Review 1.  Economic impact of cost-containment strategies in third party programmes in the US. Part II.

Authors:  C M Kozma; R M Schulz; W M Dickson; J T Dye; E R Cox; D A Holdford; L Michael; W N Yates; T L Young
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Economic analysis as an aid to subsidisation decisions: the development of Australian guidelines for pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  D Henry
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Pharmaceutical cost management and access to psychotropic drugs: the U.S. context.

Authors:  Haiden A Huskamp
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

Review 4.  Impact of pharmaceutical prior authorisation policies : a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jaume Puig-Junoy; Iván Moreno-Torres
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Making a case for employing a societal perspective in the evaluation of Medicaid prescription drug interventions.

Authors:  Sanjoy Roy; S Suresh Madhavan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Pharmaceutical policies: effects of restrictions on reimbursement.

Authors:  Carolyn J Green; Malcolm Maclure; Patricia M Fortin; Craig R Ramsay; Morten Aaserud; Stan Bardal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

7.  Delisting of drugs in Ontario. How attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians in the Kingston area changed.

Authors:  M Godwin; J Chapman; D Mowat; W Racz; J McBride; J Tang
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Impact of Medicaid preferred drug lists on therapeutic adherence.

Authors:  David B Ridley; Kirsten J Axelsen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.