| Literature DB >> 3923510 |
Abstract
The main methodological issues that should be considered in studies of premenstrual changes are discussed. They include: the selection of well-defined groups of subjects who reflect the diversity of subtypes of premenstrual changes (PMC); the confirmation of retrospective reports through daily monitoring of changes by ratings, or by objective procedures when possible; the need to consider the diversity of premenstrual biological changes instead of comparing average levels, since there is a likelihood that different pathophysiological changes are connected with diverse behavioral and mood changes; application of a multivariate, time-related approach to explore the pathophysiology of PMC; the need to exclude placebo responders prior to the active drug phase in treatment trials and the need for such trials to be double-blind, placebo-controlled and, if possible, of a cross-over design. Attention to such issues should lead to increased consistency of findings across studies and eventually to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of PMC and to a rational, effective treatment.Keywords: Behavior; Clinical Research; Diseases; Menstruation Disorders; Premenstrual Tension; Psychological Factors; Research Methodology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1985 PMID: 3923510 DOI: 10.1016/0306-4530(85)90036-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology ISSN: 0306-4530 Impact factor: 4.905