Literature DB >> 3920170

Comparison of misoprostol and cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.

A Fich, E Goldin, J Zimmerman, M Ligumsky, D Rachmilewitz.   

Abstract

The efficacy of misoprostol (a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin E1) and cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer was evaluated. Seventy-one patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were randomized in a double-blind manner in one of three groups that received four daily doses of either misoprostol, 50 or 200 micrograms, or cimetidine, 300 mg. Ulcer healing was assessed endoscopically after 4 weeks of treatment. The mean age, sex distribution, and tobacco, alcohol and caffeine consumption were similar in all treatment groups. Only one patient was lost to follow-up. On the misoprostol low dose, healing of the ulcer was observed in 60.9% of the patients. In contrast, healing on the higher dose of misoprostol was not significantly different to that with cimetidine. No significant clinical or laboratory side effects were observed in any of the patients. We found that the daily dose of 800 micrograms misoprostol is safe and effective in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3920170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Isr J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-2180


  4 in total

Review 1.  Histamine H2-receptor antagonists versus prostaglandins in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  J G Penston; K G Wormsley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Recent advances in the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease. A surgical perspective.

Authors:  M W Mulholland; H T Debas
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-09

3.  Effect of chronic misoprostol ingestion on rat gastric morphology and cell turnover.

Authors:  A Fich; N Arber; E Okon; G Zajicek; D Rachmilewitz
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Cytoprotective doses of arbacet with minimal antisecretory properties are not effective in duodenal ulcer healing.

Authors:  D Wengrower; A Fich; E Goldin; R Eliakim; M Ligumsky; D Rachmilewitz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.