Literature DB >> 3920169

Competition between strains of scrapie depends on the blocking agent being infectious.

R H Kimberlin, C A Walker.   

Abstract

Compton White mice (Sincs7) were injected twice intraperitoneally, first with the 22A strain of scrapie agent (in brain homogenates) and then, after 105 days, with the 22C strain. Incubation periods were calculated from the time of the first injection. The experiment was designed so that, with no interaction between strains, the second strain (22C) should have produced cases about 300-350 days after the first injection, depending on the dose of 22C. This was well before the limit of 470 days set by the mean incubation period minus 3 SD of 22A alone: a limit which was used to distinguish 22C from 22A clinical cases. In fact, 22A blocked 22C as shown by (i) the lengthening of 22C incubation periods, (ii) the reduced proportion of cases due to 22C, and (iii) the reduced effective titer of 22C. The blocking efficiency of 22A was not greatly reduced by physicochemical treatments that had little or no effect on its infectivity by the intraperitoneal route. However, treatment of 22A homogenates with 6 M urea virtually eliminated infectivity and also abolished blocking ability. It is concluded that competition depends on the infectivity of the scrapie strain used for blocking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3920169     DOI: 10.1159/000149588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intervirology        ISSN: 0300-5526            Impact factor:   1.763


  27 in total

Review 1.  The search for scrapie agent nucleic acid.

Authors:  J M Aiken; R F Marsh
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-09

2.  Conformational transformation and selection of synthetic prion strains.

Authors:  Sina Ghaemmaghami; Joel C Watts; Hoang-Oanh Nguyen; Shigenari Hayashi; Stephen J DeArmond; Stanley B Prusiner
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  New Molecular Insight into Mechanism of Evolution of Mammalian Synthetic Prions.

Authors:  Natallia Makarava; Regina Savtchenko; Irina Alexeeva; Robert G Rohwer; Ilia V Baskakov
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Transmission of elk and deer prions to transgenic mice.

Authors:  Gültekin Tamgüney; Kurt Giles; Essia Bouzamondo-Bernstein; Patrick J Bosque; Michael W Miller; Jiri Safar; Stephen J DeArmond; Stanley B Prusiner
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 5.  The prion strain phenomenon: molecular basis and unprecedented features.

Authors:  Rodrigo Morales; Karim Abid; Claudio Soto
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-12-15

Review 6.  Prion propagation: the role of protein dynamics.

Authors:  John A Pezza; Tricia R Serio
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.931

7.  Design and construction of diverse mammalian prion strains.

Authors:  David W Colby; Kurt Giles; Giuseppe Legname; Holger Wille; Ilia V Baskakov; Stephen J DeArmond; Stanley B Prusiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  The spatial dynamics of prion disease.

Authors:  R J Payne; D C Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Tracking protein aggregate interactions.

Authors:  Christina J Sigurdson; Jason C Bartz; K Peter R Nilsson
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.931

10.  Prion interference is due to a reduction in strain-specific PrPSc levels.

Authors:  Jason C Bartz; Michelle L Kramer; Meghan H Sheehan; Jessica A L Hutter; Jacob I Ayers; Richard A Bessen; Anthony E Kincaid
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.