Literature DB >> 3919415

Anti-rheumatic drugs and joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

D L Scott, P T Dawes, P D Fowler, K A Grindulis, M Shadforth, P A Bacon.   

Abstract

The effect of second-line anti-rheumatic drugs such as gold on the course and progression of joint damage has been the subject of considerable controversy. We have evaluated the effects of second-line anti-rheumatic drugs in three studies of 46-84 patients with rheumatoid arthritis given a second-line drug continuously for 12 months. Using two different methods of radiographic assessment we found that there was significant progression over the 12-month period when the mean changes in the groups of patients were examined, and there was similar indications of continuing disease activity shown by mean values of acute phase proteins and ESR which were above the normal range at both six and 12 months. But there were subgroups of patients who showed a reduction in ESR and joint tenderness with a related slowing of the rate of radiographic progression in the second six months of treatment. There was no direct relationship between changes in the ESR and radiographic progression in individual patients. Although anti-rheumatic drugs are not ideal and therapy does not cause remission in many patients, some patients respond well. Rheumatoid arthritis may represent a heterogeneous collection of patients who respond individually to different drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3919415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Med        ISSN: 0033-5622


  19 in total

Review 1.  Slow drugs: slow progress? Use of slow acting antirheumatic drugs (SAARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  H A Capell; M Brzeski
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  The use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  L E Hart; P Tugwell
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Short-term clinical trials of anti-rheumatoid drugs--an opinion.

Authors:  J S Dixon
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1987-06

Review 4.  Joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: radiological assessments and the effects of anti-rheumatic drugs.

Authors:  D L Scott; P A Bacon
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Rheumatoid inflammation and joint destruction: cause and effect or parallel phenomena?

Authors:  J D Williams; D L Scott; F B DeBrito; D A Willoughby; E C Huskisson
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1986-08

6.  Randomized trial of switching rheumatoid arthritis patients in remission with injectable gold to auranofin.

Authors:  P E Prete; J Zane; M Krailo; M Bulanowski
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Prediction of progressive joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving gold or D-penicillamine therapy.

Authors:  P T Dawes; P D Fowler; R Jackson; M Collins; M F Shadforth; R Stone; D L Scott
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Second line (disease modifying) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: which drug for which patient?

Authors:  H A Capell; D R Porter; R Madhok; J A Hunter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Precision of Larsen grading of radiographs in assessing progression of rheumatoid arthritis in individual patients.

Authors:  M M O'Sullivan; P A Lewis; R G Newcombe; N J Broderick; D A Robinson; E C Coles; J D Jessop
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Progressive joint damage during penicillamine therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D L Scott; A Greenwood; R Bryans; E C Huskisson
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.