Literature DB >> 3918659

Role of the CT scanner in the management of cancer.

J E Husband.   

Abstract

Although the diagnostic scope of computed tomography has widened considerably in recent years, assessment of patients with suspected or known malignant disease remains the major reason for body CT referrals in the United Kingdom. This paper sets out to define important advantages and limitations of CT in cancer diagnosis, addressing the topics of primary diagnosis, staging, and patient follow up. There is relatively little information on the influence of CT on patient management in oncology but reported studies indicate that CT directly alters clinical decisions in 14-30% of patients. This aspect requires further evaluation and is of particular relevance when considering the appropriate use of high cost technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3918659      PMCID: PMC1417994          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.290.6467.527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  43 in total

1.  A high carbohydrate leguminous fibre diet improves all aspects of diabetic control.

Authors:  H C Simpson; R W Simpson; S Lousley; R D Carter; M Geekie; T D Hockaday; J I Mann
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-01-03       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The effect of the computed tomographic scanner on utilization and charges for alternative diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  R A Enlow; J A Hodak; K W Pullen; D D Bedworth; W C Moor; T M Reahard; V A Milligan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Whitehouse lecture. Radiologic imaging: changing costs, greater benefits.

Authors:  A R Margulis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Comparison of computed tomography and angiography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  P J Weyman; B L McClennan; R J Stanley; R G Levitt; S S Sagel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The use of computed tomography in recurrent rectal tumors.

Authors:  J E Husband; N J Hodson; C A Parsons
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography in the detection of pancreatic malignancy.

Authors:  P D Kamin; M E Bernardino; S Wallace; B S Jing
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  National Cancer Institute study: evaluation of computed tomography in the diagnosis of intracranial neoplasms. I. Overall results.

Authors:  H L Baker; O W Houser; J K Campbell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Computed tomography of paranasal sinus tumors.

Authors:  C Parsons; N Hodson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Computed vs. conventional tomography in evaluation of primary and secondary pulmonary neoplasms.

Authors:  R A Mintzer; S R Malave; H L Neiman; L L Michaelis; R M Vanecko; J H Sanders
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Clinical efficacy of computed body tomography, II.

Authors:  J Wittenberg; H V Fineberg; J T Ferrucci; J F Simeone; P R Mueller; E vanSonnenberg; R H Kirkpatrick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

1.  Correlation of abdominal CT imaging with autopsy findings in patients with malignant tumors.

Authors:  M Winkelmann; W D Schoppe; N Volk; K F Bürrig; R M Jungblut; W Schneider
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  The role of CT in the management of carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia.

Authors:  J P Duignan; G P McEntee; D J O'Connell; D J Bouchier-Hayes; E O'Malley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.891

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.