Literature DB >> 391028

Comparison of three transport systems for recovery of aerobes and anaerobes from wounds.

J H McConville, R F Timmons, S L Hansen.   

Abstract

A clinical evaluation of three commercially available transport systems (Anaerobic Specimen Collector, Becton-Dickenson; Anaswab, Scott Laboratories; and Trans-Cul, Wampole) was done, using as subjects 75 patients suspected of having infections. Holding times were purposely varied and ranged from 30 min to 48 hours. Totals of 22 aerobic species and 15 anaerobic species were isolated. There was essentially no difference among the three systems in the recoveries of aerobic or anaerobic organisms. Discrepancies appeared to be related to the order of collection and amount of clinical material available for culture. Time delay from collection to plating did not affect the recovery of aerobes or anaerobes. The three systems performed equally in the recovery of clinically significant pathogens from purulent clinical material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 391028     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/72.6.968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  2 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Comparison of two transport systems for recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from abscesses.

Authors:  I Brook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.