Literature DB >> 3908126

Multicentre comparison of the antihypertensive effect of acebutolol and hydrochlorothiazide in uncomplicated mild-moderate hypertension in the elderly.

A Salvetti, M Lucchini, G Airoldi, M A Cagianelli, G Cinotti, R Cortese, G Diamanti, F Giuntoli, R Pedrinelli, G Pettinà.   

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of acebutolol, 400-600 mg/day in elderly hypertensive patients, and to compare it with hydrochlorothiazide 25-50 mg/day, 45 patients with mild-moderate uncomplicated hypertension were treated for 6 weeks in a multicentre, single-blind, randomized, crossover trial. Acebutolol decreased supine systolic blood pressure from 186.5 to 162.7 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure from 107.4 to 92.4 mmHg. Hydrochlorothiazide decreased systolic blood pressure from 185.0 to 166.4 and diastolic blood pressure from 107.2 to 96.4. There was no difference between the effects of acebutolol and hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure during the trial. Both drugs proved to be safe and effective antihypertensive agents, provided the major contraindications for their use were taken into account. Beta-blockade by acebutolol was highly effective in treating mild-moderate arterial hypertension in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3908126     DOI: 10.1007/bf00544080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  20 in total

Review 1.  Drug use in the elderly: a review of problems and special considerations.

Authors:  R E Vestal
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Epidemiology of stroke in an elderly welfare population.

Authors:  A M Ostfeld; R B Shekelle; H Klawans; H M Tufo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Effects of large and small doses of hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  P J McLeod; R I Ogilvie; J Ruedy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1970 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Systolic versus diastolic blood pressure and risk of coronary heart disease. The Framingham study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; T Gordon; M J Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Humoral and hemodynamic effects of increasing doses of captopril in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  P Sassano; R Pedrinelli; A Magagna; B Abdel-Haq; A Salvetti
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1982-04-21       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Comparison of the antihypertensive and hormonal effects of a cardioselective beta-blocker, acebutolol, and diuretics in essential hypertension.

Authors:  F Alhenc-Gelas; P F Plouin; M B Ducrocq; P Corvol; J Menard
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Five-year findings of the hypertension detection and follow-up program. II. Mortality by race-sex and age. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Controlled trial of acebutolol in hypertension.

Authors:  L Hansson; G Berglund; O Andersson; M Holm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1977-10-14       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Oxprenolol in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  S H Taylor
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1983-11-10       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Propranolol in the control of blood pressure: a dose-response study.

Authors:  M J Serlin; M L Orme; N S Baber; R G Sibeon; E Laws; A Breckenridge
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.