Literature DB >> 3907825

Randomized trial of doxorubicin versus cyclophosphamide in diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma.

P G Sørensen, F Bach, E Bork, H H Hansen.   

Abstract

The effect of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of diffuse, malignant pleural mesothelioma was evaluated in a randomized study. All patients were treated on an outpatient basis and none had previously received antineoplastic treatment. All patients had a measurable lesion other than pleural effusion. The treatment consisted of doxorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, to a total dose of 550 mg/m2, or cyclophosphamide at a dose of 1500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 1 year. At disease progression the treatment was changed to the alternate drug. The dose was increased or decreased according to hematologic effects. Thirty of 32 patients were evaluable for response. Remissions were not achieved in any patient. During treatment with doxorubicin, none of the patients developed cardiotoxicity, while one patient developed hemorrhagic cystitis during treatment with cyclophosphamide. Sepsis or bleeding was not observed in either of the treatment arms. Thus, the trial showed no antineoplastic activity of either doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3907825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep        ISSN: 0361-5960


  18 in total

Review 1.  Preclinical studies identify novel targeted pharmacological strategies for treatment of human malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Roberto E Favoni; Antonio Daga; Paolo Malatesta; Tullio Florio
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Novel systemic therapy against malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Michael R Mancuso; Joel W Neal
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06

3.  [Guidelines of the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma].

Authors:  A Scherpereel; P Astoul; P Baas; T Berghmans; H Clayson; P de Vuyst; H Dienemann; F Galateau-Salle; C Hennequin; G Hillerdal; C Le Pe'choux; L Mutti; J-C Pairon; R Stahel; P van Houtte; J van Meerbeeck; D Waller; W Weder
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2010-10

Review 4.  Chemotherapy in malignant mesothelioma: a review.

Authors:  A Krarup-Hansen; H H Hansen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  A phase II study of vincristine in malignant mesothelioma--a negative report.

Authors:  G Mårtensson; S Sörenson
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  A phase II study of the platinum analogues JM8 and JM9 in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  B M Cantwell; C R Franks; A L Harris
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Phase II trial of carboplatin (JM8) in treatment of patients with malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  E K Mbidde; S J Harland; A H Calvert; I E Smith
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  BTS randomised feasibility study of active symptom control with or without chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: ISRCTN 54469112.

Authors:  M F Muers; R M Rudd; M E R O'Brien; W Qian; A Hodson; M K B Parmar; D J Girling
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Malignant intraperitoneal mesothelioma-Başkent University experience.

Authors:  Ronalds Macuks; Halis Ozdemir; Polat Dursun; Ozlem Işıksaçan Ozen; Nihan Haberal; Ali Ayhan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-06-01

10.  An extended phase II trial of ifosfamide plus mesna in malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  G Falkson; M Hunt; E C Borden; J A Hayes; C I Falkson; T J Smith
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.