Literature DB >> 3905218

Double-blind preference and compliance multicentre study in osteoarthritis: once-a-day treatment.

R Marcolongo, N Giordano, G P Bassi, R Giannini, C Borghi, B M Francucci, E Camarri, M Mordini, F Cocco, D Neri.   

Abstract

Two-hundred-and-three female patients (mean age: 58 yrs; SD: 8.2 yrs) suffering from osteoarthritis entered this late phase IV multicentre, stratified according to previous therapy (e.g. ketoprofen, naproxen, aspirin, indomethacin or indoprofen), randomized, double-blind, between within-patient trial of 2-week duration. Each patient received either diclofenac SR 100 mg/day (D), piroxicam 20 mg/day (P), or placebo (P1 by oral route. Clinical evaluation (functional class; pain assessment; osteoarthritic condition; joint motility and stiffness) was performed at entry, as well as after the first and the second week. Patient compliance and reported signs and symptoms were recorded after the first week and at the end of the trial. Patient preference, as regards previous therapy, and global evaluation (both by the physicians and the patients) were checked at the end of the trial. The clinical evaluation showed a superiority of D and P over P1. No difference was seen between the two active drugs. Placebo effect was very strong. Global evaluation was significantly in favour of D and P. Patient compliance was extremely good (greater than or equal to 95%). Diclofenac was preferred to naproxen, aspirin and indomethacin, while piroxicam and placebo were preferred only to aspirin. The tolerability of the two active drugs was good and comparable. A significantly lower number of patients complaining of unwanted effects (u.e.) was detected in the placebo group. The number of patients withdrawn for u.e. was similar in the three trial groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3905218     DOI: 10.1007/bf02031606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  10 in total

1.  [Clinical experiences with Voltaren a new nonsteroid antirheumatic agent].

Authors:  S N Ciccolunghi; B Levi; H A Chaudri
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  1975-01-24

2.  Medication errors made by elderly, chronically ill patients.

Authors:  D SCHWARTZ; M WANG; L ZEITZ; M E GOSS
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1962-12

Review 3.  A review of medication errors and compliance in ambulant patients.

Authors:  R B Stewart; L E Cluff
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1972 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Variations in interpretation of prescription instructions. The need for improved prescribing habits.

Authors:  J M Mazzullo; L Lasagna; P F Griner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1974-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Compliance with medical regimens: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M V Marston
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1970 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  [Methods for evaluating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (1). Effect of the nature of the disease treated on the placebo effect in trials of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents].

Authors:  M J Gérard; D Serrurier; C Laplanche
Journal:  Therapie       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.070

7.  Non-steroidals ineffective in OA.

Authors:  H A Bird; V M Rhind; P A Leatham; V Wright
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1982-08

8.  Once-a-day treatment for arthritis. A comparison.

Authors:  E C Huskisson
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm       Date:  1983

9.  Drug defaulting in a general practice.

Authors:  A M Porter
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-01-25

Review 10.  Piroxicam: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  R N Brogden; R C Heel; T M Speight; G S Avery
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 9.546

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  A controlled comparison of piroxicam and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  E Gerecz-Simon; W Y Soper; W F Kean; P J Rooney; P Tugwell; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Diclofenac sodium. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  P A Todd; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Relative benefit-risk comparing diclofenac to other traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anneloes van Walsem; Shaloo Pandhi; Richard M Nixon; Patricia Guyot; Andreas Karabis; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.156

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.