Literature DB >> 3903856

Human fetal anatomy: MR imaging.

J C Weinreb, T Lowe, J M Cohen, M Kutler.   

Abstract

Twenty-four pregnant women carrying 26 fetuses (two sets of twins) were imaged with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 0.35 T following sonographic evaluation. Each study was retrospectively evaluated to determine which of 33 normal fetal structures were visible on the images and which imaging parameters were most useful for depicting fetal anatomy. Fetal motion degraded fetal images in all but two cases, both with oligohydramnios and in the third trimester of gestation. Nevertheless, many fetal structures were identifiable, particularly in the third trimester. Visualization of fetal anatomy improved with intravenous maternal sedation in five cases. Relatively T1-weighted images occasionally offered the advantage of less image degradation owing to fetal motion and improved contrast between different fetal structures. More T2 weighting was believed to be advantageous in one case for outlining the fetal head and in one case for delineation of the brain. In many cases, structures were similarly identifiable (though with different signal intensities) regardless of the parameters selected. The authors conclude that MR imaging of many fetal structures is currently unsatisfactory and is probably of limited value, particularly in the first and second trimesters. However, the relative frequency and detail with which the fetal head and liver can be depicted indicate that these may be areas for further investigation, and the potential utility of imaging fetal fat warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3903856     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.157.3.3903856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Indications for fetal magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  D Prayer; P C Brugger; E Krampl; L Prayer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  In vivo MRI of the fetal brain.

Authors:  N Girard; C Raybaud; C Dercole; L Boubli; C Chau; S Cahen; A Potier; M Gamerre
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  The use of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of fetal intracranial anomalies.

Authors:  D H Dinh; R M Wright; W C Hanigan
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Comparison of prenatal and postnatal MRI findings in the evaluation of intrauterine CNS anomalies requiring postnatal neurosurgical treatment.

Authors:  A Papadias; C Miller; W L Martin; M D Kilby; S Sgouros
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Intersection based motion correction of multislice MRI for 3-D in utero fetal brain image formation.

Authors:  Kio Kim; Piotr A Habas; Francois Rousseau; Orit A Glenn; Anthony J Barkovich; Colin Studholme
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  The developing role of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of congenital cardiac anomalies: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rohit S Loomba; Suraj Chandrasekar; Parinda H Shah; Prateek Sanan
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-07

7.  Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in medicine.

Authors:  C S McKinstry
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1986-10

Review 8.  Multimodality Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease: an Update.

Authors:  Uyen T Truong; Shelby Kutty; Craig S Broberg; David J Sahn
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2012
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.